2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy and exergy comparison of a flat-plate solar collector using water, Al2O3 nanofluid, and CuO nanofluid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The entropy generation reduction in the volume fraction of 0.01% can be related to the uniform temperature distribution in the collector, which reduces the temperature gradient in this volume fraction. A decreasing‐increasing trend in entropy generation variations is also recently reported by Tong et al who experimentally analyzed the entropy generation of CuO nanofluid flow in a FPSC. By varying the volume fraction from 0.01% to 0.1%, the solar energy absorption in the nanofluid increases, resulting in an increase in entropy generation due to heat transfer irreversibility.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The entropy generation reduction in the volume fraction of 0.01% can be related to the uniform temperature distribution in the collector, which reduces the temperature gradient in this volume fraction. A decreasing‐increasing trend in entropy generation variations is also recently reported by Tong et al who experimentally analyzed the entropy generation of CuO nanofluid flow in a FPSC. By varying the volume fraction from 0.01% to 0.1%, the solar energy absorption in the nanofluid increases, resulting in an increase in entropy generation due to heat transfer irreversibility.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Tong et al [ 82 ] studied the performance of a PV/T system when the different concentration Al 2 O 3 nanofluids are utilized as the working fluid, and found that when the concentrations of the Al 2 O 3 nanofluid are 1.5 vol %, 1.0 vol % and 0.5 vol %, the system efficiencies could attain up to 76.1%, 77.5% and 73.8%, respectively, and these are enhanced remarkably in comparison with that using water with 63.6% as given in Fig. 70 .…”
Section: Pv/t With Nanofluidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the obtained results, the author suggests that future research studies should include ANN for modelling other parameters of the solar collectors, or even the complete solar system. Tong et al [35] discovered that the use of Al 2 O 3 nanofluids could improve the thermal efficiency of flat-plate solar collectors by at least 20%, compared to water.…”
Section: Solar Thermal Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%