2016 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/coase.2016.7743423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy and peak-power optimization of existing time-optimal robot trajectories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fysikopoulos et al have taken up this challenge and developed a generalized approach to manufacturing energy efficiency based on a machine-level study [27], while Brizzi et al present a case study on the remote monitoring of robot energy consumption, demonstrating the capability of intelligent applications for managing manufacturing processes [28]. An impressive example for more energy efficiency based on process optimization is presented in [29,30], where an algorithm is introduced that allows reducing energy consumption for industrial robots up to 30% by adapting acceleration and deceleration behavior, without substituting hardware or negative consequences on the production rate.…”
Section: Sustainable Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fysikopoulos et al have taken up this challenge and developed a generalized approach to manufacturing energy efficiency based on a machine-level study [27], while Brizzi et al present a case study on the remote monitoring of robot energy consumption, demonstrating the capability of intelligent applications for managing manufacturing processes [28]. An impressive example for more energy efficiency based on process optimization is presented in [29,30], where an algorithm is introduced that allows reducing energy consumption for industrial robots up to 30% by adapting acceleration and deceleration behavior, without substituting hardware or negative consequences on the production rate.…”
Section: Sustainable Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most papers put forward frameworks that lay the theoretical foundations for more resource-efficient production in a hypothetical Industry 4.0 future, or provide prototypical solutions. Very few of the papers reviewed quantify efficiency potentials ( [40,45]), and these will need to be interpreted carefully, as their relevance and possible potentials will significantly vary in different sectors of application. The presented approach, where the dynamic behavior of robots has been adapted to operate with as little energy as possible, will be highly relevant in the automotive industries, for example, but might not be equally relevant in the chemical or textile industries, as the use of hundreds of robots is not as common there.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Issues hindering efficient activity scheduling techniques in machine-to-machine communications for more energy efficiency [37]; • workflow for integrating energy data into material flow simulation [38]; • simulation method for energy optimization [39]; and • algorithm adjusting dynamic properties of robots to reduce energy consumption [40].…”
Section: Orchestrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the first years, algorithms to handle product and automation system interaction (Bengtsson et al, 2009), and to visualize complex operation sequences using multiple projections , was developed. Over the years, other use cases have been integrated, like formal verification and synthesis using Supremica (Bergagård and Fabian, 2012), restart support , cycle time optimization (Sundström et al, 2012), energy optimization and hybrid systems (Riazi et al, 2016), online monitoring and control (Theorin et al, 2016), as well as emergency department online planning support . SP is developed as a micro service architecture, where various services interact with each other by sending messages.…”
Section: Sequence Plannermentioning
confidence: 99%