1990
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.42.5377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy and structure of uniaxial incommensurate monolayer solids: Application to Xe/Pt(111)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[16][17][18][19] One aspect that seems to be similar in all of the previous models of rotational epitaxy of adsorbed monolayers is that the interaction of the adsorbed atom with the substrate is assumed to be weak or described by a single term of the Fourier expansion. Although such approximation has been shown to be valid for simple pairwise interactions between the adsorbate and substrate atoms, 20 and confirmed for systems such as rare-gases on graphite and Xe-Pt͑111͒, [21][22][23] in the case of more complex interactions, accurate description of the atom-surface potential requires higher-order Fourier terms. 24 The Fourier expansion technique allows us to describe the atom-surface interaction potential with prescribed accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18][19] One aspect that seems to be similar in all of the previous models of rotational epitaxy of adsorbed monolayers is that the interaction of the adsorbed atom with the substrate is assumed to be weak or described by a single term of the Fourier expansion. Although such approximation has been shown to be valid for simple pairwise interactions between the adsorbate and substrate atoms, 20 and confirmed for systems such as rare-gases on graphite and Xe-Pt͑111͒, [21][22][23] in the case of more complex interactions, accurate description of the atom-surface potential requires higher-order Fourier terms. 24 The Fourier expansion technique allows us to describe the atom-surface interaction potential with prescribed accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 According to this recipe the highly coordinated lattice sites naturally emerge as preferred adsorption sites for the adatoms. However, recent experiments on the commensurate ͑ ͱ 3 ϫ ͱ 3͒R30°Xe monolayers adsorbed on Cu͑111͒ 4 and Pt͑111͒ 5 surfaces have contradicted this simple picture in two important aspects: ͑i͒ the adsorption sites for Xe atoms deduced from the measurements were on top of the Cu 6 and Pt 7,8 atoms instead in the highly coordinated threefold hollow sites, and ͑ii͒ the frequencies of inplane vibrations in monolayer Xe/ Cu͑111͒ 9-11 as measured by He atom scattering ͑HAS͒ turned out lower than could have been expected from the force constants calculated for unconstrained Xe adlayers by using accurate pairwise atomic gas phase potentials. 12 Similar observations were made also for Xe adsorption on Cu͑100͒ 10 and Cu͑110͒ 13 surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rare-gas adsorption on many close-packed metal surfaces, such as Ag(111), Al(111), Cu(111), Pd(111), Pt(111),.. have been extensively studied both experimentally [3][4][5][6] and theoretically [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Due to the non-directional character of the vdW interactions that should be dominant in physisorption processes, surface sites that maximize the coordination of the rare-gas adsorbate atom are expected to be the preferred ones, thus favoring the hollow adsorption site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%