1975
DOI: 10.1109/tns.1975.4328119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy and Temperature Dependence of Electron Irradiation Damage in GaAs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimentally, there has been some uncertainty in the value of the displacement energy in GaAs. Some early sources reported threshold ͑minimum͒ displacement values around 25 eV, 35 but most recent sources report values close to 10 eV. 28,36 -38 We could not find a value for the effective ͑average͒ displacement energy measured using nonelectrical methods at low temperatures, to which our displacement value would correspond.…”
Section: A Damage Production In Cascadesmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Experimentally, there has been some uncertainty in the value of the displacement energy in GaAs. Some early sources reported threshold ͑minimum͒ displacement values around 25 eV, 35 but most recent sources report values close to 10 eV. 28,36 -38 We could not find a value for the effective ͑average͒ displacement energy measured using nonelectrical methods at low temperatures, to which our displacement value would correspond.…”
Section: A Damage Production In Cascadesmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…A comparable value was obtained in ref. [29]. This is slightly greater than the value of the threshold displacement energy measured by Grimshaw [30] and Pegler [31], which is 17-18 eV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Many studies deal with the radiation induced damage production in GaAs [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. Many authors tried to define experimentally the threshold displacement energy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many damage factors are therefore directly compared to NIEL. The well-known "NIEL scaling approach" is shown to work quite well in most cases [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], apart from some deviations observed for electrons [15,16,28] in Si, GaAs and InGaAs, for high energy protons in GaAs [17][18][19][20][21][22] and for neutrons in GaAs [23]. Some authors also report that NIEL has to be used very carefully and is not shown to be valid for changes in depletion voltage of oxygenated and standard Silicon detectors [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%