2015
DOI: 10.3233/asy-151286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy and vorticity of the Ginzburg–Landau model with variable magnetic field

Abstract: We consider the Ginzburg-Landau functional with a variable applied magnetic field in a bounded and smooth two dimensional domain. The applied magnetic field varies smoothly and is allowed to vanish non-degenerately along a curve. Assuming that the strength of the applied magnetic field varies between two characteristic scales, and the Ginzburg-Landau parameter tends to +∞, we determine an accurate asymptotic formula for the minimizing energy and show that the energy minimizers have vortices. The new aspect in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, the assumption on the magnetic field in Theorem 1.1 is significant when b(κ)κ ≤ H ≤ M κ 2 and M ∈ (0, c 0 ] is a constant. Note also that our theorem gives a bridge between the situations studied by Attar in [1,2] and Pan-Kwek in [20]. Remark 1.4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As such, the assumption on the magnetic field in Theorem 1.1 is significant when b(κ)κ ≤ H ≤ M κ 2 and M ∈ (0, c 0 ] is a constant. Note also that our theorem gives a bridge between the situations studied by Attar in [1,2] and Pan-Kwek in [20]. Remark 1.4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Earlier results corresponding to vanishing magnetic fields have been obtained recently in [1,2]. The assumption on the strength of the magnetic field was H ≤ Cκ, where C is a constant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, if b ∈ [ǫ, 1) for some ǫ > 0 , the constants κ 0 and C can be selected independently from b, but they will depend on ǫ . More details can be found in [5,6], where it is allowed for ǫ to depend on κ, ǫ = ǫ(κ), and approach 0 as κ → +∞ .…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• If H C 1 < H < H C 2 , the superconductor is in the mixed phase, where both the superconducting and normal states co-exist in the bulk of the sample; the most interesting aspect of the mixed phase is that the region with the normal state appears in the form of a lattice of point defects, covering the whole bulk of the sample [25] ; • If H C 2 < H < H C 3 , superconductivity disappears in the bulk but survives on the surface of the superconductor ; • If H > H C 3 , superconductivity is destroyed and the superconductor returns to the normal state . The case of a non-uniform sign changing magnetic field has been addressed first in [23] then recently in [4,5,6,17,19]. In the presence of such magnetic fields, the behavior of the superconductor (and the associated critical magnetic fields) differ significantly from the case of a uniform 1 applied magnetic field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The asymptotic analysis of E gs (κ, H) has been carried for other regimes of the magnetic field strength, down to H ≈ κ 1/3 , in [4,5,19]. The case where the function B 0 is only Hölder continuous or a step function has been discussed in [17,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%