Small rural producers are responsible for approximately 60% of the country's charcoal production, in a carbonization process that occurs mostly in rudimentary masonry ovens, of the "hot tail" type, slope and surface, with low gravimetric yield (RG) and no control over Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions. The furnace kiln system allows the burning of Methane (CH4), with an innovative layout that has a chimney centered with 4 furnaces, and which allows an increase in RG when compared to traditional furnaces. In this context, the work was divided into three chapters and conducted in a rural property that produces charcoal in Lamim-MG. In chapter 1, the objective was to evaluate the carbon balance with and without the use of the furnace-furnace system for burning methane. The average annual increase in carbon (IMAC) was calculated based on two forest inventories, conducted in 2018 and 2019. GHG emissions from Eucalyptus were calculated based on the IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. The carbon balance without methane burning was 13.9465 MgCO 2e ha -1 and with burning 15.9616 MgCO 2e ha -1 . The GHG emission per unit produced was 0.6105 MgCO 2e Mg charcoal -1 with the burning of CH4 and 1.2433 MgCO 2e Mg charcoal -1 without burning GHG. In chapter 2, the objective was to compare the use of destructive and non-destructive methodologies to estimate biomass and carbon in a Eucalyptus forest. Rigorous cubing was performed on 21 trees and 3 compared methodologies. In methodology 1, control, the tree was felled, sectioned, weighed in the field and the carbon stock calculated based on these data. Methodology 2 is also destructive, with the tree felled, cubed and the estimated volume based on this data. Methodology 3 is non-destructive, with the cubed tree standing upright with the aid of equipment, pentaprism, and the estimated volume based on these data. It was concluded that the evaluated non-destructive and destructive methodologies are effective, with results equal to the control, which reduces time and cost in surveys to estimate biomass and carbon. Chapter 3 evaluated the economic feasibility of producing wood and charcoal, and how the variation in costs and revenues can impact this result, through sensitivity analysis using the Monte Carlo technique. The wood production was economically viable, with a NPV of R$212.68 ha -1 and a VPE of R$88.74 ha -1 with an average production cost of R$71.37 m3 wood-1. The mean value of VPE found in the sensitivity analysis was R$ 96.82 ha -1 . The production of charcoal was economically viable, with NPV of R$23.41 mdc charcoal -1 and VPE of R$18.57 mdc charcoal -1 . The average value of the VPE found in the risk analysis was R$51.78 mdc charcoal -1 . It was possible to conclude that the production of eucalyptus wood and charcoal is economically viable in the region. Keywords: Forest Biomass. Charcoal. Sustainable Steel Industry.