2000
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy assimilation, parental care and the evolution of endothermy

Abstract: The question of the selection forces which initiated the evolution of endothermy in birds and mammals is one of the most intriguing in the evolutionary physiology of vertebrates. Many students regard the aerobic capacity model as the most plausible hypothesis. This paper presents an alternative model, in which the evolution of endothermy in birds and mammals was driven by two factors: (i) a selection for intense posthatching parental care, particularly feeding o¡spring, and (ii) the high cost of maintaining th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

14
161
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
14
161
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An assumption of the aerobic capacity model is that basal metabolic rate (BMR) and MMR are inescapably correlated in endotherms (Hayes and Garland, 1995). Another model that postulates endothermy evolved as a correlated response to selection is the assimilation capacity model (Koteja, 2000). That model suggests that selection acted on the energy assimilation capacity of the visceral organs (for example, liver and gut) and that the assimilation capacity of the visceral organs is correlated with resting metabolic rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An assumption of the aerobic capacity model is that basal metabolic rate (BMR) and MMR are inescapably correlated in endotherms (Hayes and Garland, 1995). Another model that postulates endothermy evolved as a correlated response to selection is the assimilation capacity model (Koteja, 2000). That model suggests that selection acted on the energy assimilation capacity of the visceral organs (for example, liver and gut) and that the assimilation capacity of the visceral organs is correlated with resting metabolic rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models have been questioned because the proposed benefits of initial increases in heat production could be outweighed by elevated energy requirements and would not result in heat production that was rapid enough to enable endothermy (Bennett and Ruben, 1979;Ricklefs et al, 1996;Stevenson, 1985;Angilletta and Sears, 2003). Another set of models suggests that endothermy evolved as a correlated response to selection on genetically correlated characters (Bennett and Ruben, 1979;Ruben, 1995;Farmer, 2000;Koteja, 2000). Perhaps the first of these models was the aerobic capacity model, which postulates that endothermy evolved as a correlated response to selection on maximal metabolic rate (MMR or aerobic capacity) during exercise (Bennett and Ruben, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, the issue of the slope of the relationship between BMR and body mass dominated the field, and the discussion continues (McNab 1988;Kozłowski & Weiner 1997;Garland & Ives 2000;Hochachka et al 2003;White & Seymour 2003). Later, the focus shifted to interspecific variation and correlations with life history, environment, food habits and phylogenetic history (McNab 1980;Harvey et al 1991;Koteja & Weiner 1993;Degen et al 1998;Lovegrove 2003), and to the relationship between BMR and maximum or daily metabolic rate (Bennett & Ruben 1979;Koteja 1987Koteja , 2000Hinds & Rice-Warner 1992;Sparti 1992;Hayes & Garland 1995;Ricklefs et al 1996;Degen et al 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second hypothesis was that a higher BMR may be related to a higher sustained metabolic rate (SusMR); the maximal rate of metabolism that an individual could sustain over days and weeks (Drent and Daan, 1980). This may also provide a context for the evolution of endothermy (Farmer, 2000;Koteja, 2000). SusMR is presumed to be limited by an animal's morphology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%