Energy Balance, Productivity and Resource-Use Efficiency of Diverse Sustainable Intensification Options of Rainfed Lowland Rice Systems under Different Fertility Scenarios

Abstract

Rice-based cropping systems (RBCS) are a kingpin of global food security and rice fallow is one of the largest (>14 m ha) RBCS. A three-year study was carried out to develop sustainable intensification options and efficient nutrient management protocols of RBCS with greater water and energy productivity and more profits. Rice-lentil, rice-linseed and rice-rapeseed systems were tested in a split-plot design with nutrient management practices involving fertilizer levels (50%, 75% and 100% recommended fertilizer dose; RDF), green manuring with Sesbania (SGM) and rice residue incorporation (RRI). The results indicated that SGM produced significantly better rice productivity, enhanced 6.4–22.7% yield of succeeding crops and increased profits by ~20%. Application of 75 or 100% of RDF produced 24.5–30.3% higher grain yield of rabi crops. System intensification resulted in an additional rice equivalent yield (REY) of ~1–1.6 t ha−1. SGM consumed relatively more energy (76,793 MJ ha−1) but at the same time, resulted in higher energy output (182,657 MJ ha−1), net energy (105,864 MJ ha−1), energy intensity (1.68 MJ INR−1) and human energy profitability (787) than the RRI. However, RRI recorded a higher energy ratio (2.42), energy productivity (0.082 kg MJ−1) and energy profitability (1.42 kg MJ−1). The rice-linseed cropping system resulted in greater system productivity, higher energy output (186,305 MJ ha−1) and net energy (112,029 MJ ha−1) than other systems. Overall, considering energy productivity, resource-use efficiency and profits, a rice-linseed system coupled with SGM and 75% RDF may be recommended as a sustainable intensification option in RBCS.

Understanding Resource Recycling and Land Management to Upscale Zero-Tillage Potato Cultivation in the Coastal Indian Sundarbans

“…Such intensification is envisioned as a pathway to enhance agricultural productivity while minimizing negative environmental impacts, typically by maximizing the yields from limited land, water, and other inputs [10,11]. The integration of SI in smallholder systems is often dependent on the provisions of internal inputs and their efficient utilization [12,13]. There is evidence of the efficient use of endogenous farm resources [14], emphasizing the importance of precisely understanding the on-farm mechanisms of resource use to redesign, sustain, and upscale SI interventions in a given region.…”

“…Land 2024, 13, 108 3 of 23 The study posits that the incorporation of ZTPC into rice-based cropping systems is primarily shaped by on-farm resource recycling dynamics, which are crucial for sustaining the input requirements of ZTPC across various farm types. This endogenous mechanism, in conjunction with extra-farm factors such as climate stresses and local institutions, determines the feasibility of upscaling ZTPC, thus shaping the future land and natural resource use in the region.…”