1995
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1995)121:12(1349)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-Based Cohesive Crack Propagation Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…by Swenson and Ingra ea 16 and Bittencourt et al, 17 in the framework of the FRANC2D system. Xie et al 18 and Xie and Gerstle 19 describe a 2-D system using singular ÿnite elements with a virtual crack extension and special remeshing rules. Portela et al 20 report an application of the dual boundary element method to crack propagation.…”
Section: -D Crack Growth Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by Swenson and Ingra ea 16 and Bittencourt et al, 17 in the framework of the FRANC2D system. Xie et al 18 and Xie and Gerstle 19 describe a 2-D system using singular ÿnite elements with a virtual crack extension and special remeshing rules. Portela et al 20 report an application of the dual boundary element method to crack propagation.…”
Section: -D Crack Growth Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saleh and Aliabadi [29] validated their numerical model by taking f t = 2.8 -MPa and G F = 100 N/m. Xie and Gerstle [24] for the same set of tests took: f t = 4.0 MPa and G F = 150 N/m; obviously, the concrete fracture parameters are quite different. A relatively small number of beams were tested in each series.…”
Section: Comparison With the Experiments By Arrea And Ingraffeamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cohesive crack model, developed by Hillerborg and co-authors [1] for mode I fracture of concrete, was shown to be efficient to model the fracture process of quasi-brittle materials. It has been extended to mixed mode fracture (modes I and II) and incorporated into finite element programs [23][24][25][26][27][28] and into boundary element codes [29]. One of the difficulties associated with these programs is that they require the remeshing and/or refinement of the finite element mesh when the crack grows, and some of them also require an input of material properties that are difficult to evaluate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the finite element method (FEM), the boundary element method (BEM) and two more recent numerical approaches: meshless methods and extended FE methods. Since the FEM was first used to model crack propagation in reinforced concrete beams by Ngo and Scordelis [1], it has been the predominant numerical method for crack problems [2][3][4]. However, crack propagation modelling with the FEM is still a challenging subject, because it usually requires both fine crack tip meshes [5][6] and sophisticated remeshing algorithms during crack propagation [7][8] to accurately calculate fracture parameters such as stress intensity factors (SIFs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%