2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.04.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy consumption and material fluxes in hard coating deposition processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CVD process reveals a higher consumption compared to the PVD when considering all of the process steps. This has been demonstrated by several studies, such as sustainability assessments regarding manufacturing processes, energy consumption, and material flows in hard coating processes [65,66].…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The CVD process reveals a higher consumption compared to the PVD when considering all of the process steps. This has been demonstrated by several studies, such as sustainability assessments regarding manufacturing processes, energy consumption, and material flows in hard coating processes [65,66].…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Thus, it is possible to conclude that heating, etching, and refrigeration have a much lower contribution to energy consumption. Figure 4 compares the energy consumption for the PVD (using MS) and CVD during the deposition steps [65]. A global industrial concern is energy consumption to help reduce costs [64].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, novel antimicrobial nanocomposites, e.g., based on halloysite nanotubes and Ag and ZnO nanoparticles [ 10 ], flax fibers with Ag and ZnO nanoparticles [ 11 ], or cellulose with Ag nanoparticles [ 12 ] have been suggested. A drawback of some of the used synthesis techniques is that they are based on the use of harmful and toxic chemicals [ 13 ], that they are not suitable to realize the required nanocomposite architecture necessary for multi-functional surfaces or that they are vacuum-based techniques resulting in high efforts and costs for production [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further concerning energy input on fabrication of thin films, PVD have higher efficiency in power consumption than CVD. In a study, Gassner et al (GASSNER et al, 2016) have stated that more than 40% of the energy consumed in a CVD typical process belongs to the heating ramp from room temperature to working conditions, while in PVD depositions the most energy demanding stage is the coating step itself, with roughly three quarters of the global energy consumption. These advantages justify the role of PVD as one of the main processes for coatings deposition nowadays.…”
Section: Deposition Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%