2020
DOI: 10.1063/5.0002285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy consumption comparison of static pitch propeller and variable pitch propeller using maximum thrust equation approach in small scale electric unmanned aerial vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the adjustable-pitch propellers (APP) are superior to the VSP with respect of the distribution rationality of the attack angle, force and power [26], [27]. Stevenson et al [28] compared the energy consumption of VSP and APP for a small electric unmanned aerial vehicle, and the results indicated that the APP was proven to be more efficient than the VSP. Sheng and Sun [29], Gebauer et al [30], and Henderson and Papanikolopoulos [31] carried out research on control and optimization of adjustable-pitch MPS for electric multicopters aimming at minimizing power consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the adjustable-pitch propellers (APP) are superior to the VSP with respect of the distribution rationality of the attack angle, force and power [26], [27]. Stevenson et al [28] compared the energy consumption of VSP and APP for a small electric unmanned aerial vehicle, and the results indicated that the APP was proven to be more efficient than the VSP. Sheng and Sun [29], Gebauer et al [30], and Henderson and Papanikolopoulos [31] carried out research on control and optimization of adjustable-pitch MPS for electric multicopters aimming at minimizing power consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%