2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.12.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy consumption, costs and environmental impacts for urban water cycle services: Case study of Oslo (Norway)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
75
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
75
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The recovery of wastewater energy from WWTPs can be considered an environmentally friendly, approved and economically competitive technology as numerous feasibility studies and realized wastewater heat recovery systems throughout Europe, for instance in Switzerland [26,27], Scandinavia [28,29] and Germany [30,31], have demonstrated. In Austria, wastewater heat recovery is to date not as prevalent as in the above-mentioned countries, although some projects have been realized already [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recovery of wastewater energy from WWTPs can be considered an environmentally friendly, approved and economically competitive technology as numerous feasibility studies and realized wastewater heat recovery systems throughout Europe, for instance in Switzerland [26,27], Scandinavia [28,29] and Germany [30,31], have demonstrated. In Austria, wastewater heat recovery is to date not as prevalent as in the above-mentioned countries, although some projects have been realized already [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The environmental impact these operations generate is relevant when the grid is stagnant, because there is no impact of DWTDN construction (Venkatesh & Brattebø, 2012). Nevertheless, previous studies have concluded that the resource consumption of the maintenance phase is negligible compared with the energy consumed to pump water (Venkatesh & Brattebø, 2011;Piratla et al, 2012;Del Borghi et al, 2013). For this reason, the maintenance phase was not considered in this study.…”
Section: Drinking Water Transport and Distribution Networkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Energy consumption in water supplied and wastewater treated in Spain is similar to energy consumption in Southern California: 2.9 kWh/m 3 (California Energy Commission, 2006), and in Germany: 2.69 kWh/m 3 (Hardi & Garrido, 2010), although it differs from energy consumption in Northern California: 0.9 kWh/m 3 (California Energy Commission, 2006), and Oslo: 1.25 kWh/m 3 (Venkatesh & Brattebø, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%