2019
DOI: 10.1039/c9cp01567a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy conversion efficiency in low- and atmospheric-pressure plasma polymerization processes with hydrocarbons

Abstract: Revealing threshold energies in plasma polymerization processes with hydrocarbons by measuring the specific energy input (per monomer molecule) in low- and atmospheric-pressure plasmas.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

6
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the energy conversion efficiency (ECE) is defined for Δ H = E th , as recently introduced for plasma polymerization. [ 56,58,59 ] For the latter, the maximum efficiency is, thus, limited to ~37%, as reached for E pl ≤ E th, considering Equation (). Similar energy conversion efficiencies have also been defined regarding both deposition rates and conversion rates with respect to the specific energy input in plasma polymerization.…”
Section: Basic Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the energy conversion efficiency (ECE) is defined for Δ H = E th , as recently introduced for plasma polymerization. [ 56,58,59 ] For the latter, the maximum efficiency is, thus, limited to ~37%, as reached for E pl ≤ E th, considering Equation (). Similar energy conversion efficiencies have also been defined regarding both deposition rates and conversion rates with respect to the specific energy input in plasma polymerization.…”
Section: Basic Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before depositing the PPF from an ethylene plasma an argon plasma pre-treatment step caused a slight cross-linking and improved attachment of PEG molecules to the film. The second process step was started at a pressure of 0.2 mbar to provide mild deposition conditions comprising low ion energies at the liquid-solid interface, followed by a reduction in pressure to 0.1 mbar to enhance the cross-linking during film growth [106]. The depositing step was followed by another argon plasma treatment to improve the adhesion between PPF and silicone backing.…”
Section: Materials and Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third process consisted of a pretreatment with Ar plasma, as described above, followed by a coating process to deposit an amorphous hydrocarbon (a‐C:H) film using 16 sccm ethylene (C 2 H 4 ) with a power input of 30 W. The pressure was initially set at 0.2 mbar for 1 min and was then reduced to 0.1 mbar for another 9 min. The higher pressure conditions provided mild deposition conditions with low ion energies at the liquid–solid interface, followed by enhanced cross‐linking during film growth by lowering pressure . For the resulting a‐C:H films, a thickness of about 200 nm was determined.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%