2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy cost of walking in transfemoral amputees: Comparison between Marlo Anatomical Socket and Ischial Containment Socket

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 The quantification of metabolic energy cost, as an evaluation of the overall efficiency of gait, has been widely used to compare prosthetic elements. [3][4][5][6] However, the reference method of quantification, oxygen consumption, implies the measurement of exhaled gas and cannot always be easily integrated into conventional gait analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 The quantification of metabolic energy cost, as an evaluation of the overall efficiency of gait, has been widely used to compare prosthetic elements. [3][4][5][6] However, the reference method of quantification, oxygen consumption, implies the measurement of exhaled gas and cannot always be easily integrated into conventional gait analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the ICS, support is further supplemented by hydrostatic weight-bearing as a result of the relatively smaller socket volume, and a narrow proximal medial-lateral socket dimension improves coronal plane stability. A variant of ICS introduced in the early 2000s is the Marlo Anatomical Socket (MAS), 21 which achieves coronal plane stability by containing only the ischial ramus and lowering other trim lines to allow greater range of hip motion. Another design, introduced in the last decade, is the High-Fidelity (Hi-Fi) socket, 22 which has struts that compress the soft tissues of the thigh to achieve femur stabilisation, allowing excess tissue to flow through openings between the struts.…”
Section: Prosthetic Socket Designs and Suspension Mechanisms Of The Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In trans-femoral prosthetics, liner suspensions are only slowly becoming more prevalent, which is owed to the less readily accommodated properties of typical residual limbs, namely their length, shape, and tissue composition [96]. Nonetheless, remarkable improvements in terms of socket compliance, hip range of motion, appearance (damage to clothing), and muscle utilization have been achieved with modern socket designs and materials [97][98][99][100].…”
Section: Prosthetic Components and Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%