2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9002(02)01625-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy degrader optimization for medical beam lines

Abstract: This paper describes the optimization of a variable energy degrader design for the Midwest Proton Radiotherapy Institute (MPRI) [1]. To optimize the energy degrader design we investigate the choice of an optimal material for the degrader, the beam emittance growth in the degrader, and the matching of the degraded beam with the acceptance of a medical beam line.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is often used for light ions, such as protons, to obtain lower energies quickly [1][2][3][4]. Because of the SRIM stopping power for light ions well described above 1 MeV, the accuracy of the calculation is also good.…”
Section: Thimet Codementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is often used for light ions, such as protons, to obtain lower energies quickly [1][2][3][4]. Because of the SRIM stopping power for light ions well described above 1 MeV, the accuracy of the calculation is also good.…”
Section: Thimet Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of the energy degraders and targets play important role for the nuclear physics experiments. For example, the energy degraders are needed for light ions to obtain lower energies quickly or to obtain energies which cannot be produced by accelerators [1][2][3][4]. The thickness and homogeneity information of the targets are also crucial for the reaction cross section measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cyclotrons without a tuneable beam energy, the primary beam energy can be degraded using materials placed in the beam path (Anferov, 2003). Candidate materials include copper, graphite and aluminum; in this study 48.5 mm up-beam from the solid target.…”
Section: Choice and Measurement Of Beam Degradermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transmission of accelerated particles that pass through such a rangeshifter made of carbon and then continue to the patient has been reported to range from 72% at 230 MeV to 3% at 100 MeV (Flanz et al, 1998). At least one institution places individual range-shifters in each side beamline directed to each treatment room rather than a single range-shifter in the main trunk line (Anferov, 2003;Anferov et al, 2003). This arrangement allows the main trunk line to maintain a constant, well-tuned, single energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%