creasing energy, a minimum at about 100°, and a back-angle rise. Figure 8 indicates that the absolute cross sections are also the same. This coincidence of the two cross sections for these companion reactions may be considered as a demonstration of the charge symmetry of nuclear forces. 5 The analysis by Butler and Symonds 6 of the older 10-Mev data on these reactions 4,7 indicates that a simple stripping model can account for the shape of the distributions from the forward peak through the second minimum. Their calculation, however, cannot account for the back-angle rise. An attempt to account for this rise by considering stripping of the triton, using the exchange stripping model of Owen and Madansky, 9,8 led to the conclusion that a triton stripping amplitude that would account for the back-angle rise was inadequate to account for the magnitude of the second maximum. A triton amplitude sufficiently large to give rise to an interference term sufficiently 9 George E. Owen and L. Madansky, Phys. Rev. 105, 1766 (1957); Am. J. Phys. 26, 260 (1958).Cross sections for the (n,2n) reaction have been measured at an incident neutron energy of 14.4=1=0.3 Mev for 27 nuclides. These measurements were made relative to the cross section for the Cu 63 (^,2w)Cu 62 reaction. The relative cross sections were then converted to absolute cross sections by using the weighted mean of several Cu 63 (w,2w)Cu 62 reaction-cross-section measurements made by other investigators.