Mutant strain 1073 of Lemna perpusilla is conduded to be blocked between plastoquinone and cytochromef in the photosynthetic electron transport system. The location of the block is based on the following observations of activities in chloroplasts isolated from the mutant and wild-type plants. (a) Relative to wild type, electron flow rates from water to ferricyanide, 2,6-dichlorophenol indophenol or NADP were very low in the mutant, but rates of photosystem I-dependent electron flow and cydic phosphorylation were high. Chloroplasts were prepared from Lemna and lettuce as previously described (2), except for the addition of 0.5 mg/ml of BSA to the grinding and washing media and 10 mg/ml to the resuspension medium (7). Chl concentration was determined according to Arnon (1). The reduction of ferricyanide, DCPIP, or NADP was measured in a Cary 14 spectrophotometer with an attachment to reduce scattering effects. Oxygen uptake was measured with a Yellow Springs Instrument Clark type 02 electrode. ATP formation was assayed as described (2). Chl fluorescence induction and ATP-driven reverse electron flow (18)
RESULTSThe ability of mutant 1073 to photoreduce several electron acceptors in reactions requiring excitation of photosystem II, photosystem I, or both is given in Table I. Electron transport from water to ferricyanide, DCPIP, or NADP was very poor in the mutant chloroplasts relative to the WT or to lettuce. The rates of ferricyanide reduction in the WT or lettuce chloroplasts were stimulated 2-to 3-fold by the addition of the uncoupler methylamine, whereas the rate in the mutant chloroplasts was unaffected, indicating that the block was not located in the energy-converting system. In the photosystem I-sensitized electron transport from reduced DAD to 02 (9), the mutant was about as effective as the WT. Consistent with the above results, mutant chloroplasts were inactive in photophosphorylation coupled to electron flow from water to ferricyanide but were active in PMS-catalyzed cyclic photophosphorylation. The major block was therefore in the electron transport system close to photosystem II. To determine whether the block was located before, at, or after photosystem II, Chl fluorescence induction was followed. Figure 1 shows that the WT and mutant had essentially identical fluorescence induction curves, which were similarly affected by the addition of DCMU. The dark recovery of the variable fluorescence yield was also similar in the wild type and mutant (not shown). Since the rise in the variable fluorescence yield upon illumination is thought to be due to the electron transport system from water to and including the "pool" of electron acceptors (14), mainly plastoquinone, it is clear from the latter observa-577 www.plantphysiol.org on May 8, 2018 -Published by Downloaded from