Energy efficiency analysis of applying phase change materials and thermal insulation layers in a building

Asghari, Morteza; Fereidoni, Sahar; Fereidooni, Leila; Nabisi, Mehrdad; Kasaeian, Alibakhsh

doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114211

Cited by 16 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The energy storage also impacts the resilience performance. At the building level, electric battery, hot water storage, boreholes [85] and phase change materials can be added to extend the habitability duration and resilience [96]. This also requires planning, costing, and sizing for optimal and feasible solutions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards Extensive Definition and Planning of Energy Resilience in Buildings in Cold Climate

Rehman,

Hamdy,

Hasan

2024

Buildings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The transition towards a sustainable future requires the reliable performance of the building’s energy system in order for the building to be energy-resilient. “Energy resilient building in cold climates” is an emerging concept that defines the ability to maintain a minimum level of indoor air temperature and energy performance of the building and minimize the occupant’s health risk during a disruptive event of the grid’s power supply loss in a cold climate. The aim is to introduce an extensive definition of the energy resilience of buildings and apply it in case studies. This article first reviews the progress and provides an overview of the energy-resilient building concept. The review shows that most of the relevant focus is on short-term energy resilience, and the serious gap is related to long-term resilience in the context of cold regions. The article presents a basic definition of energy resilience of buildings, a systematic framework, and indicators for analyzing the energy resilience of buildings. Terms such as active and passive habitability, survivability, and adaptive habitable conditions are defined. The energy resilience indicators are applied on two simulated Finnish case studies, an old building and a new building. By systematic analysis, using the defined indicators and thresholds, the energy resilience performance of the buildings is calculated and compared. Depending on the type of the building, the results show that the robustness period is 11 h and 26 h for the old building and the new building, respectively. The old building failed to provide the habitability conditions. The impact of the event is 8.9 °C, minimum performance (Pmin) is 12.54 °C, and degree of disruption (DoD) is 0.300 for the old building. The speed of collapse (SoC) is 3.75 °C/h, and the speed of recovery (SoR) is 0.64 °C/h. On the other hand, the new building performed better such that the impact of the event is 4 °C, Pmin is 17.5 °C, and DoD is 0.138. The SoC is slow 3.2 °C/h and SoR is fast 0.80 °C/h for the new building. The results provide a pathway for improvements for long-term energy resilience. In conclusion, this work supports society and policy-makers to build a sustainable and resilient society.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%