Energy Efficiency and Energy Saving Potential in China: A Directional Meta-Frontier DEA Approach

Abstract

Abstract:Increasing energy efficiency and exploiting energy saving potential are two important practices that can help to ensure future energy security in China. This paper proposes a new total factor energy efficiency indicator, based on the directional meta-frontier data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach, to account for the heterogeneity of production technology among provinces in China. This indicator considers both energy savings and economic development, and can also decompose the energy saving potential. An empirical research study conducted on 29 Chinese provinces indicates that the differences in energy efficiency and production technology among the Chinese regions are quite significant. Most eastern coastal provinces maintain high-energy efficiency and advanced production technology, while energy efficiency in the west is typically lower. As a rule, improvements in technical and management factors are needed to exploit energy saving potentials. However, the emphasis on these two factors in each province should differ. China's general energy efficiency is relatively low; the absolute amount of nationwide energy saving potential is on the rise.

Study of Urban Energy Performance Assessment and Its Influencing Factors Based on Improved Stochastic Frontier Analysis: A Case Study of Provincial Capitals in China

“…Stochastic frontier analysis reflects performance levels by the gap between actual production and the production frontier. An optimal production frontier could provide a standard to compare urban energy performance [36]. Neoclassical production theory is the foundation of explaining the stochastic frontier analysis model.…”

Measuring the Meta Efficiency and Its Determinants on Efficiency in the Korean Coffee Shop Franchise

“…Thus, if coffee shop franchisors with both homogenous and heterogeneous characteristics are analyzed together within the same production set, this can lead to inaccuracies and analytical errors in efficiency analysis [8,9]. In comparing a franchisor's efficiency among individual groups with different strategic characteristics, the efficiency of heterogeneous groups should be measured separately, depending on their operational alternatives and business model [9,10]. This procedure mainly offers efficient operating resource allocation policies and strategic benchmarking initiatives to compare franchisors' operation efficiency with industry best practices.…”

“…">Analysis Technique (1): Metafrontier DEA ModelTraditional DEA models consider the units selected for analysis as a homogenous group, thus, it is supposed that all the considered DMUs use the same technology and are completely homogenous organizations [18]. Comparisons of technological efficiencies among groups cannot be performed using conventional DEA because the technical efficiency of a particular company is difficult to compare with that of others operating with other technologies [9,10]. However, franchising activity includes numerous and diverse sectors and groups, such as travel agencies, hotels, restaurants, and fashion outlets.…”

Declining Energy Intensity in the U.S. Agricultural Sector: Implications for Factor Substitution and Technological Change

“…The reduced energy intensity might be attributable to substantial increases in energy prices, advances in energy efficiency or changes in output composition [5,6]. While the increased energy prices could have forced agricultural producers to reduce the use of energy directly, factor substitution or technological improvement could have reduced energy intensity by improving energy efficiency [7][8][9][10]. If changes in the energy market conditions (e.g., energy prices) affected production costs, the U.S. agricultural sector might have increased capital investment in energy-saving technologies to counter high and volatile energy prices; or changes in output composition could have contributed to the reduction in energy intensity, because crop and livestock production systems require different energy use.…”