2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy efficiency as a credence good: A review of informational barriers to energy savings in the building sector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
2
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The EPBD introduced Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) to provide tenants and buyers with synthetic and third-party information regarding the efficiency of real estate to eliminate market asymmetries. Such a strategy is relevant since market failures, in the form of imperfect information and asymmetries, are suggested to be barriers in the diffusion of efficient buildings [3], producing an "energy gap" (i.e., a rate of adoption well below the social optimum) [4]. Therefore, the recast of the Directive in 2010 (2010/31/EU) made it mandatory to include EPC labels in the marketing of almost all new and existing buildings in order to inform prospective users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EPBD introduced Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) to provide tenants and buyers with synthetic and third-party information regarding the efficiency of real estate to eliminate market asymmetries. Such a strategy is relevant since market failures, in the form of imperfect information and asymmetries, are suggested to be barriers in the diffusion of efficient buildings [3], producing an "energy gap" (i.e., a rate of adoption well below the social optimum) [4]. Therefore, the recast of the Directive in 2010 (2010/31/EU) made it mandatory to include EPC labels in the marketing of almost all new and existing buildings in order to inform prospective users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research suggests a wide range of factors may act as barriers to the acceptance, support and adoption of energy-efficient behaviours and deep renovation technologies and projects. These include social norms (and habits), a lack of information about the implication of alternative actions on the environment, split incentives, a lack of instruction on how to use new technologies, a lack of information on energy consumption and energy saving opportunities, short-termism and disturbance of daily routines including hygiene factors [7,14,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. It should be noted that there is evidence that household characteristics impact the adoption of energy-efficient technologies including education, age and house-hold composition, and these factors vary across European countries [14].…”
Section: Human Barriers To Deep Renovation Adoption and Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increasing number of studies point to energy retrofit projects that fail to deliver predicted energy savings (Metcalf and Hassett, 1999;Graff Zivin and Novan, 2016;Fowlie et al, 2018). While these studies attribute the missing savings to modeling flaws in engineering calculations, Giraudet et al (2018) propose an alternative explanation rooted in information asymmetries. Evaluating a home weatherization program conducted in Florida, the authors provide evidence that retrofit contractors engage in moral hazard by under-providing quality in hard-to-observe measures such as insulation installation or duct sealing.…”
Section: Testable Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%