2020
DOI: 10.1002/ett.4007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy efficiency enhancement of cell‐free massive multiple‐input multiple‐output network employing threshold‐based beamforming

Abstract: The downlink of cell‐free massive multiple‐input multiple‐output network is considered. It is assumed that both access points (APs) and users are equipped with multiple antennas. A heuristic threshold‐based‐beamforming (TBF) protocol is proposed, which performs an AP selection algorithm to significantly improve the total energy efficiency (EE) of the network. The beamforming method that fits the model is the maximum eigenmode beamforming (MEB). The threshold level is determined in such a way that the strongest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We begin by stating the main system constraints that are common to the three problems. First, for hop 1, any subcarrier n can only transmit in a unique MCS level m as well as be associated with a unique relay node k as shown in (2), that is,…”
Section: Problem Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We begin by stating the main system constraints that are common to the three problems. First, for hop 1, any subcarrier n can only transmit in a unique MCS level m as well as be associated with a unique relay node k as shown in (2), that is,…”
Section: Problem Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, increasing the EE or reducing the energy cost per transmitted bit has become a key requirement in fifth generation and beyond mobile communication networks. Motivated by this requirement, the design of energy-aware architectures and green systems has attracted considerable interest in the recent literature in scenarios with or without relays 2,3 . However, the design of energy-efficient networking techniques must not affect the quality of service (QoS) perceived by users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uplink processing MMSE [59,124,145,146] ZF [147] Power allocation and load balancing [148] Max-min power control [149] Pilot power control [150] Sequential linear MMSE [120] mmWave Limited fronthaul capacity [151] Power control [152] Channel modeling [153] Energy efficiency [154] Energy Efficiency [116,132,[155][156][157] Imperfect Fronthaul [158][159][160][161][162][163][164] Low Resolution ADCs [163,[165][166][167] Hardware Impairments [164,[168][169][170] Non-orthogonal [171][172][173][174][175] Multiple Access…”
Section: Topics Aspects and Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The user‐centric architecture is a “disruptive and innovative” design for 5G and even future B5G networks. The user‐centric network (UCN) breaks the traditional cell‐specific architecture and implements user equipment (UE)‐specific design by dynamically constructing the optimal groups for different users, which is recognized as a promising technology for future wireless networks that provides uniformly great services to all users considering no cell boundary 10 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The user-centric network (UCN) breaks the traditional cell-specific architecture and implements user equipment (UE)-specific design by dynamically constructing the optimal groups for different users, which is recognized as a promising technology for future wireless networks that provides uniformly great services to all users considering no cell boundary. 10 As Zhang et al 8 mentioned, multiple TPs serving the UE at the same time are regarded as a user-centric group called transmission point group (TPG). As a result, UCN is composed of multiple overlapping user-centric groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%