2020
DOI: 10.2478/rtuect-2020-0020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Efficiency – Indoor Air Quality Dilemma in Educational Buildings: A Possible Solution

Abstract: AbstractThe energy efficiency – indoor air quality dilemma is well known and the main drawback to operate the mechanical ventilation is electricity costs as concluded from previous studies. Educational buildings are one of the places where future taxpayers spend a lot of time. This paper aims to study an alternative solution on how to reduce energy efficiency – indoor air quality dilemma in educational buildings by adopting systems that use renewable energy sources. A typical e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated life cycle of solar panels is 25 years [85,86]. Thus, we assume that both the project and regional average life cycles of solar batteries are 25 years.…”
Section: Identifying Priority Home Green Energy Projects For Financin...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated life cycle of solar panels is 25 years [85,86]. Thus, we assume that both the project and regional average life cycles of solar batteries are 25 years.…”
Section: Identifying Priority Home Green Energy Projects For Financin...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How can we ensure that university classrooms consume less energy while maintaining acceptable indoor air quality levels? Educational buildings are among the most essential building typologies where indoor air quality is crucial [1][2][3][4][5]. This is because students and educators spend most of their time in these buildings, and the state of air quality management significantly impacts their concentration levels, creativity, productivity, and overall health and well-being.…”
Section: Introduction 1background and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indoor carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) is generated mainly by the breathing of people in the room [ 1 – 4 ]. According to the standards of the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers [ 5 ], indoor air CO 2 levels should be well below 1,000 ppm to avoid the negative effects of poor indoor air quality [ 6 – 9 ]. A carbon dioxide concentration of 5,000 ppm (0.5%) is taken as the safety threshold for an eight-hour working day [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%