2020
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2020.3033288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-Efficient and Delay-Fair Mobile Computation Offloading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A benefit from integrating CLE into the problem formulation is that we no longer require the hard completion time constraints in the problem formulation. The objective in [21] is to minimize the energy consumption of the entire system, and in references [22] and [33], the objective is to minimize the total energy consumption of all MDs. Instead of satisfying delay constraints, the work in [24], [25], [34] optimize a utility function that is a weighted sum of task completion time and energy consumption.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A benefit from integrating CLE into the problem formulation is that we no longer require the hard completion time constraints in the problem formulation. The objective in [21] is to minimize the energy consumption of the entire system, and in references [22] and [33], the objective is to minimize the total energy consumption of all MDs. Instead of satisfying delay constraints, the work in [24], [25], [34] optimize a utility function that is a weighted sum of task completion time and energy consumption.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference [21] studies the problem of task offloading and channel resource allocation for ultra-dense networks and minimizes the total energy consumption of the system with a limited delay tolerance. The work in [22] studies MCO by considering application latency fairness and minimizes MD energy consumption by jointly optimizing the offloading ratio, channel assignments, and channel time allocations. Reference [23] investigates the power minimization problem for meeting the service delay requirements in multi-cell multi-user mobile edge computing networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where N G and N m are the numbers of groups and sensors in each group, respectively. 3) ECM scheme: In the ECM scheme, the bipartite graph is generated to record the Q i,k for all sensor-MEC combinations, then, the KM algorithm is used to find the optimal matching to minimize the energy consumption, as used in [8]- [10]. The computational complexity of this scheme is O[N I (4N 4 + 6N 3 + N ) + 2N 2 I + N 4 I + log(1/ε)].…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, existing IoT computation offloading schemes have the following two challenges. Firstly, traditional schemes usually focus on the optimization of computation or communication performance, such as computing latency minimization, energy consumption minimization, or network throughput maximization [3], [8]- [10]. The Gas 1 factor only affects the block generation speed and is not considered in computational resource allocation, leading to the dissatisfaction of sensors as better computational resources are not allocated to those sensors under the performance priority strategy even if they pay high Gas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this, the problem OPT.1 formulated in Chapter 3 can be transformed into a geometric programming (GP) problem and solved optimally using commercial software, such as matlab. However, this approach requires high computation complexity because Successive Convex Approximation (SCA) [22] is needed in order to transform the posynomials in the constraint functions into monomials to fit the general format of the GP. The complexity becomes prohibitively high when the number of sensor nodes is large.…”
Section: Proposed Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%