2002
DOI: 10.1145/605432.605408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-efficient computing for wildlife tracking

Abstract: Over the past decade, mobile computing and wireless communication have become increasingly important drivers of many new computing applications. The field of wireless sensor networks particularly focuses on applications involving autonomous use of compute, sensing, and wireless communication devices for both scientific and commercial purposes. This paper examines the research decisions and design tradeoffs that arise when applying wireless peer-to-peer networking techniques in a mobile sensor network designed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In some cases, sensors are attached to the targeted objects or location (Jovanov et al, 2003;Juang et al, 2002, Martinez et al, 2005 in order to monitor the data of interest or current location. Mobile sensor networks have a different set of supporting infrastructures compared to the traditional WSN.…”
Section: Mobility Of Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some cases, sensors are attached to the targeted objects or location (Jovanov et al, 2003;Juang et al, 2002, Martinez et al, 2005 in order to monitor the data of interest or current location. Mobile sensor networks have a different set of supporting infrastructures compared to the traditional WSN.…”
Section: Mobility Of Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be application specific results in a more complicated design process, especially in the case of designing a generic power-aware protocol. I n t o t a l , s e v e n g r o u p s o f a p p l i c a t i o n s h a v e b e e n c a t e g o r i s e d b y u s b a s e d u p o n t h e i r functionalities including habitat monitoring (HM) (Juang et al, 2002;Mainwaring et al, 2002;Szewczyk et al, 2004), environmental monitoring (EM) (Allen et al, 2006;Martinez et al, 2005), health monitoring (HEM) (Jovanov et al, 2003, Otto et al, 2006, structural health monitoring (SHM) (Chintalapudi et al, 2006;Kottapalli et al, 2003;Paek et al, 2005, Schmid et al, 2005, event detection and tracking (EDT) (Arora et al, 2004;Dreicer et al, 2002;Simon et al, 2004), transport monitoring (TM) (Coleri et al, 2004) and location-aware system (LAS) (Brignone et al, 2005). Specific capabilities and underlying communication paradigms have been outlined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasingly, sensor networks research incorporates dynamic network topologies as well. In [7], [8], [9], the authors conduct an experimental analysis on a dynamic sensor network where nodes move in a large area gathering data and then sending the collected data when near an access point. In our paper, the nodes move in a prespecified pattern and gather media, e.g.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this will usually imply further degrading the connectivity. Another proposed solution is to architecture the network into multiple tiers as in Zebranet [12] or DataMules [10], thus maximizing energy savings at one single tier -albeit the most sensitive one -the sensor tier. However, such a network specialization is hard to implement in social, urban scenarios where heterogeneity is key property and association/dissociation of nodes to the network is very dynamic.…”
Section: Resource-centric Routingmentioning
confidence: 99%