2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-7394-1_60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-Efficient Data Transmission to Detect Pest in Cauliflower Farm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following comparative methods are considered: Adaboost (Liu et al , 2016), SVM (Liu et al , 2016), deep-CNN (Nam and Hung, 2018), GOA-based deep-CNN (Mirjalili et al , 2018) and MFO-based deep-CNN (Mirjalili, 2015) are compared with the proposed MFGHO-based deep-CNN classifier, with respect to the data aggregation strategies, namely, O-SEED + Rider-Cat swarm optimization (RCSO) (Shyjith et al , 2020), genetic spider monkey optimization (GMSO) + spider monkey optimization (SMO) (Soundaram and Arumugam, 2020), TOPSIS + fuzzy multi-criteria clustering and bio-inspired energy efficiency routing (FMCB-ER) (Mehta and Saxena, 2020), FABC + water wave optimization (WWO) (Kumar and Kumar, 2016; Zheng, 2015), protruder optimization, ABC + invasive weed optimization (IWO) (Misaghi and Yaghoobi, 2019; Zheng, 2015), artificial bee colony (ABC) + protruder optimization (Misaghi and Yaghoobi, 2019; Zheng, 2015; Karaboga and Basturk, 2008) and FABC + protruder optimization algorithm [23] (Misaghi and Yaghoobi, 2019; Zheng, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following comparative methods are considered: Adaboost (Liu et al , 2016), SVM (Liu et al , 2016), deep-CNN (Nam and Hung, 2018), GOA-based deep-CNN (Mirjalili et al , 2018) and MFO-based deep-CNN (Mirjalili, 2015) are compared with the proposed MFGHO-based deep-CNN classifier, with respect to the data aggregation strategies, namely, O-SEED + Rider-Cat swarm optimization (RCSO) (Shyjith et al , 2020), genetic spider monkey optimization (GMSO) + spider monkey optimization (SMO) (Soundaram and Arumugam, 2020), TOPSIS + fuzzy multi-criteria clustering and bio-inspired energy efficiency routing (FMCB-ER) (Mehta and Saxena, 2020), FABC + water wave optimization (WWO) (Kumar and Kumar, 2016; Zheng, 2015), protruder optimization, ABC + invasive weed optimization (IWO) (Misaghi and Yaghoobi, 2019; Zheng, 2015), artificial bee colony (ABC) + protruder optimization (Misaghi and Yaghoobi, 2019; Zheng, 2015; Karaboga and Basturk, 2008) and FABC + protruder optimization algorithm [23] (Misaghi and Yaghoobi, 2019; Zheng, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this strategy suffers with the difficulty of sensing the images remotely for the prediction process. The routing protocols based on energy efficiency concept are performed by various researchers (Mirjalili, 2015; Mirjalili et al , 2018; Misaghi and Yaghoobi, 2019; Zheng, 2015; Shyjith et al , 2020; Soundaram and Arumugam, 2020; Mehta and Saxena, 2020; Karaboga and Basturk, 2008) through the bio-inspired algorithms, where the convergence of the optimizations to the global optimal solution is minimal with the need for an algorithm that possesses higher tendency toward the local optima avoidance criterion. Similarly, in Nam and Hung (2018), Dadheech et al (2022), Sneha and Rekha (2020) and Rajmohan et al (2021), the machine learning and deep learning models are presented, which suffered from the accuracy concerns because of the lack of the appropriate training.…”
Section: Motivation For the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%