2018
DOI: 10.1109/mcom.2018.1701054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-Efficient Device-to-Device Edge Computing Network: An Approach Offloading Both Traffic and Computation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As MEC and D2D communication are both applications of the offloading concept [9], [291], [292], the authors in [293], [294] proposed different MEC architecture to further improve the network performance compared with the standard MEC. A D2D-based MEC architecture was proposed in [293], where each relay gateway can act as a local cloud.…”
Section: ) Lightweight Platforms For Edge Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As MEC and D2D communication are both applications of the offloading concept [9], [291], [292], the authors in [293], [294] proposed different MEC architecture to further improve the network performance compared with the standard MEC. A D2D-based MEC architecture was proposed in [293], where each relay gateway can act as a local cloud.…”
Section: ) Lightweight Platforms For Edge Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, D2D communication is used to establish direct connections between a relay gateway and users so as to provide edge services and between two neighbor relay gateways to balance the traffic and computation demands among them. The work in [294] introduced a concept of "MEC D2D". Concretely, D2D MEC enables the direct link between users and the MEC server, neighboring D2D helps users to connect with the other server if they are not satisfied with the local MEC sever, cooperative relay can extend the MEC service, conventional MEC provides service to users via the collocated eNB, and remote cloud let all users with Internet access use cloud services.…”
Section: ) Lightweight Platforms For Edge Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most papers, when authors talk about "the fog computing architecture", they mean something like the structure shown in Fig. 1; examples include [7,11,25,55,61,63,71,72]. There are some small variations: e.g., some authors also allow communication among end devices [63] or among fog nodes [11], Sharma et al differentiate between "edge nodes" and "fog nodes" [55], while Zhou et al [72] extend the three layers of Fig.…”
Section: Architecture In Fog Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the above studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of the resource allocation strategy of RF energy harvesting combined with MEC to improve the computation performance of communication system, the limited computing resources of MEC server is not always adequate to support all SMDs under the coverage range of base station (BS). To improve this situation, there have been also several works [17]- [19] that investigate the device-to-device (D2D)assisted MEC system. In [17], the D2D-assisted and nonorthogonal multiple access (NOMA)-based MEC system was investigated to minimize the weighted sum of the energy consumption and delay of all SMDs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A novel D2D-enabled multi-helper MEC system was developed in [18], where the local user could offload its computing tasks to multiple helpers and download the results from them over an orthogonal pre-scheduled time slot. J. Wen et al [19] attempted to further improve the energy-efficient communication in MEC by proposing a D2D offloading architecture. The aforementioned studies mainly focus on the communication system with energy harvesting from ambient or dedicated RF sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%