2018
DOI: 10.17487/rfc8352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-Efficient Features of Internet of Things Protocols

Abstract: This document describes the challenges for energy-efficient protocol operation on constrained devices and the current practices used to overcome those challenges. It summarizes the main link-layer techniques used for energy-efficient networking, and it highlights the impact of such techniques on the upper-layer protocols so that they can together achieve an energy-efficient behavior. The document also provides an overview of energy-efficient mechanisms available at each layer of the IETF protocol suite specifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first existing standard considered for processing is RFC 3221 which is responsible for performing inter-domain routing in IoT [35]. The second existing standards which are related to IoT is RFC 8352 which is responsible for implementing gateway scheme in IoT [36]. This section illustrates all outcome achieved.…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first existing standard considered for processing is RFC 3221 which is responsible for performing inter-domain routing in IoT [35]. The second existing standards which are related to IoT is RFC 8352 which is responsible for implementing gateway scheme in IoT [36]. This section illustrates all outcome achieved.…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been claimed that "devices may frequently go into sleep mode, thus it is infeasible to maintain a long-lived connection in IoT applications" [12]. However, RDC techniques allow the exchange of packets between an energyconstrained device and another device, at the expense of increased delay and buffering requirements [11]. With appropriately configured RDC mechanisms, and since storing state consumes a low amount of energy, we argue that long TCP connections are perfectly feasible.…”
Section: Tcp Connection Maintenancementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Communication, and in particular, idle listening, is the main energy-consuming component in such devices. In order to save energy, many IoT devices use radio duty cycling (RDC), by which the radio interface is kept in off state by default, and is turned on for communication under certain conditions [11]. It has been claimed that "devices may frequently go into sleep mode, thus it is infeasible to maintain a long-lived connection in IoT applications" [12].…”
Section: Tcp Connection Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy efficiency is one critical issue for IoT devices as they will typically be batterypowered, and the longer lifetime, the better. In addition to the processing overhead issue, broadcast transmissions in wireless networks are costly in terms of energy consumption because they need to acquire the medium for a long time [Gomez et al 2018]. Thus, the more unnecessary broadcast is avoided, the more efficient is the energy consumption.…”
Section: Energy Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%