Energy Efficient Framework for Mobility Supported Smart IP-WSN

Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) has become a credible member of pertinent research areas. This is attributed mainly to its capability of enabling mobility without imposing constraints or requirements on the mobile node (MN). This MN shield is enabled due to the transferring of mobility-related signaling to a new entity, which is called Mobile Access Gateway (MAG). However, associating MNs to a specific MAG inside the PMIPv6 network increases the MAG load probability. Thus, several research have enhanced the PMIPv6 protocol to improve its basic specifications and performance. Strategies include protocols, which apply the clustering technique to enhance the overall performance of the PMIPv6 in terms of routing, scalability, lifetime, and load balancing. The load balancing mechanism is considered in the non-clustered protocols. However, this mechanism has not been adopted in clustering-based protocols. Thus, pertaining to the load and the respective assignments is critical. In this article, to address these issues, a new load balancing mechanism is proposed among MAGs for Cluster-based Proxy Mobile IPv6 (CSPMIPv6) protocol. The signaling within the CSPMIPv6 has been enhanced to support the proposed load balancing mechanism. The proposed mechanism employs the inter-and intra-domain on a frequent basis to select the best MAG among the candidate MAGs. The new mechanism has improved the performance to create an evident improvement in terms of average queuing delay, handover latencies, transmission rate, end-to-end delay, and packet loss as compared to the LBM-PMIPv6 mechanism and CSPMIPv6 protocol.

show abstract

“…To tackle these issues, research findings such as Sensor Proxy MIPv6 (SPMIPv6) [6][7][8], Cluster-based PMIPv6…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Load balancing mechanism for clustered PMIPv6 protocol

Ghaleb¹,

Subramaniam²,

Zukarnain³

et al. 2018

J Wireless Com Network

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On the other hand, some approaches like sensor proxy MIPv6 (SPMIPv6) [26][27][28], cluster-based PMIPv6 for wireless mesh networks [29], and a cluster-based proxy mobile IPv6 (CSPMIPv6) [24] employed clustering techniques to reduce the handover latency. The architectures of SPMIPv6 and cluster-based PMIPv6 for wireless mesh networks suffers from problems existing in PMIPv6 due to the centralizing the entire action via central and single LMA.…”

Section: Enabling Ip Mobility Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This could be a problematic for IoT equipment which uses diverse applications [83,84]. The SPMIPv6 protocol, proposed by [26][27][28], is the first protocol that works on smart sensor network-based localized mobility management (SLMA), particularity focusing on energy efficiency. The SPMIPv6 is derived from the MIPv6 architecture with the ability to make the distinct WSN interconnecting via shared backbone architecture.…”

Section: Ip-enabled Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mobility management for IoT: a survey

Ghaleb

Subramaniam

Zukarnain

et al. 2016

J Wireless Com Network

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Internet of Thing (IoT) or also referred to as IP-enabled wireless sensor network (IP-WSN) has become a rich area of research. This is due to the rapid growth in a wide spectrum of critical application domains. However, the properties within these systems such as memory size, processing capacity, and power supply have led to imposing constraints on IP-WSN applications and its deployment in the real world. Consequently, IP-WSN is constantly faced with issues as the complexity further rises due to IP mobility. IP mobility management is utilized as a mechanism to resolve these issues. The management protocols introduced to support mobility has evolved from host-based to network-based mobility management protocols. The presence of both types of solutions is dominant but depended on the nature of systems being deployed. The mobile node (MN) is involved with the mobility-related signaling in host-based protocols, while network-based protocols shield the host by transferring the mobility-related signaling to the network entities. The features of the IoT are inclined towards the network-based solutions. The wide spectrum of strategies derived to achieve enhanced performance evidently displays superiority in performance and simultaneous issues such as long handover latency, intense signaling, and packet loss which affects the QoS for the real-time applications. This paper extensively reviews and discusses the algorithms developed to address the challenges and the techniques of integrating IP over WSNs, the attributes of mobility management within the IPv4 and IPv6, respectively, and special focus is given on a comprehensive review encompassing mechanisms, advantages, and disadvantages on related work within the IPv6 mobility management. The paper is concluded with the proposition of several pertinent open issues which are of high research value.

show abstract

“…Islam et al [6,26,27] proposed the SPMIPv6 for a localized mobility management in IP-WSN, which is the first work on IP-WSN localized mobility with a special consideration of energy efficiency. The SPMIPv6 architecture inherited from the PMIPv6 architecture consists of the sensor localized mobility anchor (SLMA), a sensor mobile access gateway (SMAG), and several fully functional IP sensor nodes.…”

Section: Sensor Proxy Mobile Ipv6mentioning

confidence: 99%

A cluster-based proxy mobile IPv6 for IP-WSNs

Jabir

Subramaniam

Ahmad

et al. 2012

J Wireless Com Network

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Sensor Proxy Mobile IPv6 (SPMIPv6) has been designed for IP-based wireless sensor networks mobility to potentially save energy consumption by relieving the sensor nodes from participating in the handoff process. However, SPMIPv6 is dependent on a single and central Local Mobility Anchor (LMA), and thus, it inherited most of the problems observed in the Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) protocol, including long handoff latency, non-optimized communication path, and bottleneck issues. In addition, SPMIPv6 extends the single point of failure to include both the authentication and network information. This study presents an enhanced architecture for SPMIPv6 called Clustered SPMIPv6 (CSPMIPv6) to overcome the problems above. In the proposed architecture, the Mobility Access Gateways (MAGs) are grouped into clusters, each with a distinguished cluster Head MAG (HMAG). The HMAG is mainly designed to reduce the load on LMA by performing intra-cluster handoff signaling and providing an optimized path for data communications. The proposed architecture is evaluated analytically, and the numerical results show that the proposed CSPMIPv6 outperforms both SPMIPv6 and PMIPv6 protocols in terms of LMA load, local handoff delay, and transmission cost performance metrics.

show abstract

Energy Efficient Framework for Mobility Supported Smart IP-WSN

Cited by 11 publications

References 20 publications

Load balancing mechanism for clustered PMIPv6 protocol

Load balancing mechanism for clustered PMIPv6 protocol

Mobility management for IoT: a survey

A cluster-based proxy mobile IPv6 for IP-WSNs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About