2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-019-06911-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Efficient Power Allocation Using Salp Particle Swarm Optimization Model in MIMO–NOMA Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tables 2 and 3 give the critical state values of the node height and the flow of the connecting pipes. Negative flow in pipe 5 indicates that the power flow is from node 6 to node 5[ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: State Estimation Model Of the Regional Power Gas-integrated ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tables 2 and 3 give the critical state values of the node height and the flow of the connecting pipes. Negative flow in pipe 5 indicates that the power flow is from node 6 to node 5[ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: State Estimation Model Of the Regional Power Gas-integrated ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this work was considered only two users; it failed to process multiple users. Khaleel Ahmed and Venkateswara Rao [21] developed the salp particle swarm optimization for power allocation (SPPA) based power among the users of the NOMA. The bit error rate (BER) of SPPA was reduced along with the increment in users.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DPA based metaheuristic optimization methods are iterative methods that increase implementation complexity as well as conventional DPA numerical search methods. For instance, DPA based DE 49 has been compared with GRPA, DPA based PSO 50 has been compared with NGDPA and GRPA, while DPA based GA has been compared with FTPA 51 and GRPA 52 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DPA based metaheuristic optimization methods are iterative methods that increase implementation complexity as well as conventional DPA numerical search methods. For instance, DPA based DE 49 has been compared with GRPA, DPA based PSO 50 has been compared with NGDPA and GRPA, while DPA based GA has been compared with FTPA 51 and GRPA. 52 As can be seen from the related works given above, no comprehensive and realistic comparison of various DPA strategic design methods has yet been published, taking into account the BER, sum-rate capacity, fairness, and distance between the users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%