2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10776-005-0024-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-efficient Routing of Multimedia Traffic in Frequency-Hop Packet Radio Networks

Abstract: Conservation of energy is important in a packet radio network, but reliance on energy-efficient routes for all types of traffic leads to large delays and low success probabilities in many situations. We describe and evaluate protocols that select routes according to the service priorities of the traffic. Energy conservation is emphasized for delay-tolerant traffic but sacrificed for delay-intolerant traffic, which gives good performance for both types of traffic.KEY WORDS: Packet radio networks; multimedia rou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For mixed-media traffic, QoS priorities vary among the traffic types, and the protocols must account for the differences in these priorities (e.g., low delay for voice traffic, error-free reception for computer files). Our energy-efficient multimedia protocols described in [PRW04a] and [PRW05] account for these differences and select routes according to the service priorities of the traffic. Energy conservation is emphasized for delay-tolerant traffic, but energy conservation is sacrificed for delayintolerant traffic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For mixed-media traffic, QoS priorities vary among the traffic types, and the protocols must account for the differences in these priorities (e.g., low delay for voice traffic, error-free reception for computer files). Our energy-efficient multimedia protocols described in [PRW04a] and [PRW05] account for these differences and select routes according to the service priorities of the traffic. Energy conservation is emphasized for delay-tolerant traffic, but energy conservation is sacrificed for delayintolerant traffic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%