2013
DOI: 10.1109/tsmca.2012.2199305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-Efficient Scheduling in Nonpreemptive Systems With Real-Time Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to quantify the gains of GEDP relative to FPP on context switching, we defined four analysis indicators. R c is the context switch reduction rate of a task in one experiment, shown as Equation 6; R v is the average context switch reduction rate of a task in multiple experiments, shown as Equation (7); R t is the total context switch reduction rate for all tasks in one experiment, shown as Equation (8); R vt is the average context switch reduction rate for all tasks in multiple experiments, shown as Equation (9).…”
Section: Times Linpack_benchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to quantify the gains of GEDP relative to FPP on context switching, we defined four analysis indicators. R c is the context switch reduction rate of a task in one experiment, shown as Equation 6; R v is the average context switch reduction rate of a task in multiple experiments, shown as Equation (7); R t is the total context switch reduction rate for all tasks in one experiment, shown as Equation (8); R vt is the average context switch reduction rate for all tasks in multiple experiments, shown as Equation (9).…”
Section: Times Linpack_benchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the ongoing focus on the energy consumption of real-time embedded systems, how to minimize the energy consumption under the premise of guaranteeing system schedulability has been gaining increased attention in recent years [7,8]. At present, the energy optimized technology for embedded systems is at different levels, including the circuit level, system level, storage level, and compile level [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These above articles considered uniprocessor in their proposed scheduling algorithms. In few other studies such as [16,11,19,20], they presented a CPU scheduling on multi-core and multi-processor. In [11], the focus was on the energy-efficient scheduling of periodic RT tasks on multi-core processors, which cores are partitioned into multiple blocks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally the CPU finishing time of the tasks calculate according to Eq. (19). To calculate of current task, in case of waiting time, the t is considered in the Eq.…”
Section: Cpu and Hdd Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that other schedules could be employed for the relatively simple scheduling of only two interleaved tasks, e.g., an elementary static cyclic schedule [84], [85]. Additionally, scheduling techniques that consider energy-efficiency, e.g., [86]- [89] may be considered. The detailed examination of different scheduling approaches for the proposed R-FFT node is beyond the scope of this study and is and interesting direction for future research.…”
Section: Interleaving Timing Of Fft Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%