2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2013.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-efficient train control: From local convexity to global optimization and uniqueness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
104
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Albrecht et al (2013a) proved that the switching points obtained from the local energy minimization principle are uniquely defined for each steep section of track and therefore also deduced that the global optimal strategy is unique. They now reported an implementation of the algorithm in a DAS called Energymiser, the follow up of Freightmiser.…”
Section: Exact Methods Without Regenerative Brakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Albrecht et al (2013a) proved that the switching points obtained from the local energy minimization principle are uniquely defined for each steep section of track and therefore also deduced that the global optimal strategy is unique. They now reported an implementation of the algorithm in a DAS called Energymiser, the follow up of Freightmiser.…”
Section: Exact Methods Without Regenerative Brakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, many studies focus on the efficient driving of the train. Albrecht et al [15] proved that the optimal switching points are uniquely defined for each steep section, and the global optimal strategy is also unique. Carvajal et al [16] proposed an optimization algorithm to obtain the minimum energy consumption and the Pareto optimal curve for CBTC (communication-based train control).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First some energy-efficient operation strategies, which choose the proper switch points among the four driving phase (acceleration, cruising, coasting and braking) in order to minimize the energy cost for a single train, had been described [1,2]. On this basis some extended work have been presented, like the local to global energy-efficient control strategy with the local steep rail track in [3] and the multi-stage energy-efficient subway control approach for multi-trains [4]. Moreover, a number of advanced control methods had been used for train tacking problem, which can make sure not only the punctuality but also precise train stopping under the train overspeed protection, Linear Quadratic Regulation (LQR) [5], H2/H∞ control [6], robust adaptive control [7], iterative learning control [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the methods above, however, are either only considering the optimal speed trajectory planning [1][2][3] or closed-loop tracking problem [5][6][7][8]. Compared with the two-level approach above, an approach combining the calculation of optimization with implementation of tracking control together is more cost effective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%