2023
DOI: 10.13052/spee1048-5236.4133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy, Environment, and Sustainability: A Multi-criteria Evaluation of Countries

Abstract: Energy, the environment, and sustainability are all strongly intertwined concerns. While humanity aims to spread the comfort and welfare it has achieved on a global scale, as well as to achieve more development and comfort through technological advances, it is caught in a stalemate caused by the world’s use of resources as if they are limitless, as well as irrevocable environmental damage. The major topic of this dilemma is energy. Using ARAT, CRITIC, SOWIA, CRADIS, and CODAS-Sort, this study aims to evaluate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensitivity analysis can be performed using various approaches, such as changing the weighting coefficients of the criteria, changing the units of measurement in which the values of the alternatives are expressed, changing the scales presenting the linguistic criteria, changing the type of criteria (cost/benefit), and comparing the results obtained by various methods. Most studies, however, conduct a sensitivity analysis based on changes in the weighting coefficients of the criteria and compares similar MCDA methods' results (Biswas, 2020;Durmić et al, 2020;Božanić et al, 2021;Biswas et al, 2021a;Biswas et al, 2021b;Aytekin, 2022). For this reason, changing criteria weight coefficients and comparing similar MCDA methods' results are used to make sensitivity analysis for the validation of results.…”
Section: Validation Of Results and Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sensitivity analysis can be performed using various approaches, such as changing the weighting coefficients of the criteria, changing the units of measurement in which the values of the alternatives are expressed, changing the scales presenting the linguistic criteria, changing the type of criteria (cost/benefit), and comparing the results obtained by various methods. Most studies, however, conduct a sensitivity analysis based on changes in the weighting coefficients of the criteria and compares similar MCDA methods' results (Biswas, 2020;Durmić et al, 2020;Božanić et al, 2021;Biswas et al, 2021a;Biswas et al, 2021b;Aytekin, 2022). For this reason, changing criteria weight coefficients and comparing similar MCDA methods' results are used to make sensitivity analysis for the validation of results.…”
Section: Validation Of Results and Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, to investigate changes in criterion weighting coefficients, fourteen different sets were created. The weight values of the other criteria were changed only once for each criterion to create these sets (Aytekin, 2022). These sets, which include new criterion weight coefficients, are shown in Table 6.…”
Section: Validation Of Results and Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High-emission countries have a limited role in renewable energy, which has a significant impact on countries with greater emissions. Aytekin (2022) applied ARAT, CRITIC, SOWIA, CRADIS, and CODAS-Sort, his study intends to analyze countries on the basis of energy, environment, and sustainability triangle. The results suggest that industrialized countries are in a better situation than developing and underdeveloped countries in terms of sustainable energy and environmental issues.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has shown the outstanding advantage in minimizing the rank reversals [15]. Although it was found in a very short time, this method was applied by some scientists for ranking the alternatives in some studies: ranking agricultural machines [16], assessing the impact of FDI (Foreign Direct Investments) to the sustainability of the economic system [17], ranking forty-six countries based on three alternatives include energy, environment and sustainability [18], evaluating the global innovation index of the countries from the Western Balkans [19]. This method was also improved into fuzzy CRADIS method for ranking types of pear in Serbia [20], and selecting green suppliers [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%