2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2004.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy estimate and fundamental solution for degenerate hyperbolic Cauchy problems

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to give an uniform approach to different kinds of degenerate hyperbolic Cauchy problems. We prove that a weakly hyperbolic equation, satisfying an intermediate condition between effective hyperbolicity and the C ∞ Levi condition, and a strictly hyperbolic equation with non-regular coefficients with respect to the time variable can be reduced to firstorder systems of the same type. For such a kind of systems, we prove an energy estimate in Sobolev spaces (with a loss of derivatives) whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Well-posedness in H ±∞ hence follows from (2.3). The proof of Proposition 2.1 is given in [2]. Now we are ready to prove Theorem 1.1.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Well-posedness in H ±∞ hence follows from (2.3). The proof of Proposition 2.1 is given in [2]. Now we are ready to prove Theorem 1.1.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Dependence on the space variable x ∈ R n , n ≥ 1, of the lower order terms b, c is allowed by Colombini and Nishitani, [10]; there C ∞ well posedness is proved for a larger, for k > 2, value of γ. In [2] C ∞ well posedness with the optimal γ is reobtained for a second order equation (1.1) where a has the particular structure a(t, x, ξ ) = α(t)Q(t, x, ξ ), for a non negative function α ∈ C ∞ [0, T ] and for an elliptic symbol of the second order Q.…”
Section: Condition (14) Is Sharp Since the Cauchy Problem Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we want to construct a representation of the solution of (3.12) by producing its fundamental solution. The construction presented here follows the procedure in [2,3,4] and [18,Section 10.7] and goes in three steps: first we reduce the higher-order hyperbolic equation to a first-order system, then we compute the fundamental solution to the resulting first-order system and finally, we obtain a representation formula for the fundamental solution to the higher-order equation. First step: Reduction to a first-order system.…”
Section: Solution Theory For Strictly Hyperbolic Pde With Variable Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, results of "well-posedness with loss of derivatives" in Sobolev spaces can be obtained under suitable assumptions in the case of weakly hyperbolic equations, i.e. equations having real characteristic roots which are not necessarily distinct and separate at every time, see for example [2] and the references therein. Here well-posedness with loss of derivatives means that in this case the fundamental solution E(t, s) results to be a Fourier integral operator of order δ > 0, and so by Duhamel's formula (3.11) one obtains a solution U which is less regular then the data, i.e.…”
Section: Stochastic Second-order Hyperbolic Equations -The Case Of Wementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular in [6] the technique is very similar to that one in [7]. In [5] and [9] some convolution weights are introduced to treat the coefficients depending on x, while in [1] the approximate energies method is used together with some pseudodifferential theory arguments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%