2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-019-01856-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Evolution of Coal at Different Depths Under Unloading Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sliding friction between the fracture planes dissipates energy, and the generation of new fracture planes requires energy absorption, which means that the failure and damage of coal specimens is a process of energy accumulation, dissipation, and release [51][52][53]. The changes in stress and energy of coal specimens are shown in Figure 11 [54][55][56][57].…”
Section: Effect Of Loading Rate On Energy Dissipation and Releasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sliding friction between the fracture planes dissipates energy, and the generation of new fracture planes requires energy absorption, which means that the failure and damage of coal specimens is a process of energy accumulation, dissipation, and release [51][52][53]. The changes in stress and energy of coal specimens are shown in Figure 11 [54][55][56][57].…”
Section: Effect Of Loading Rate On Energy Dissipation and Releasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the convenience of calculation, the elastic energy U e is properly simplified. e energy of each part of the rock element in the principal stress space can be expressed as follows [28]:…”
Section: E Energy Evolution Of Sandstone Under Uniaxial Loading-unloading Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the stresses in rock masses are constantly adjusting with mining at different depths [27][28][29][30], resulting in complex stress loading and unloading processes, rock mass damage accumulation, and significant mining-induced deformation and damage, which seriously affect crack propagation and distribution in mining-induced coal and rocks [31]. Xie et al [32] explored the distribution law of the abutment pressure in a coal seam, analyzed the mining dynamic characteristics of the peak value and position of the abutment pressure in front of the working face under the influence of mining, obtained the dynamic stress conditions due to mining of the coal body in front of the working face, and further carried out experimental research on the dynamic behavior of rock during coal mining.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this, the initial confining pressures of the coal samples at burial depths of 300 m, 600 m, 850 m, and 1050 m in the Pingdingshan coal mine area were 14.2 MPa, 31.3 MPa, 40.7 MPa, and 43.6 MPa, respectively. Referring to the generalization method of the mining stress path by Xie et al [32,33], the experimental process was divided into three stages: the hydrostatic pressure stage, the first unloading stage, and the second unloading stage (as shown in Figure 3).…”
Section: Testing Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the evolution path of mining disturbance unloading stress experienced by coal near the working face was simulated, and the testing program of coal samples at different depths is shown in Table 1. [32,33], the experimental process was divided into three stages: the hydrostatic pressure stage, the first unloading stage, and the second unloading stage (as shown in Figure 3).…”
Section: Testing Programmentioning
confidence: 99%