2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.07.095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy, exergy, and economic evaluations of a CCHP system by using the internal combustion engines and gas turbine as prime movers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The main parameters of the system are shown in Table 1 . Meanwhile, to further clarify the performance of the proposed system, a comparison of AA-CAES to a combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) system using the internal combustion engines and gas turbine in Reference [ 32 ] is demonstrated in Table 2 . In the comparison case, the round-trip efficiency for each system is 96.5% and 87%, respectively.…”
Section: Simulation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main parameters of the system are shown in Table 1 . Meanwhile, to further clarify the performance of the proposed system, a comparison of AA-CAES to a combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) system using the internal combustion engines and gas turbine in Reference [ 32 ] is demonstrated in Table 2 . In the comparison case, the round-trip efficiency for each system is 96.5% and 87%, respectively.…”
Section: Simulation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 where ex f is the chemical exergy of fuel, and it is obtained from Equation(20). 33 where is the ratio of fuel chemical exergy to the heating value. For natural gas, the value of is considered to be 1.04.…”
Section: Energy and Exergy Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yong et al [30] constructed a wide range of technical, environmental and economic indicators to evaluate Malaysia photovoltaic systems. Abbasi et al [31] constructed energy and economic indicators of a combined cooling, heating and power (CCHP) system in Iran, and presented appropriate condition of its operation. Finally, the design scheme with the highest comprehensive evaluation benefit was selected.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%