2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2021.101481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy, exergy and economics study of a solar/thermal panel cooled by nanofluid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the selection of nanofluid type in a PVT system is vital to ensure compatibility and meet the desired performance criteria. Table 6 summarizes studies involving PVT systems with nanofluids as coolant media, featuring different types and configurations [54,[137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147].…”
Section: Nanofluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the selection of nanofluid type in a PVT system is vital to ensure compatibility and meet the desired performance criteria. Table 6 summarizes studies involving PVT systems with nanofluids as coolant media, featuring different types and configurations [54,[137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147].…”
Section: Nanofluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of revenue, the economic analysis was performed using the annual worth (AW) method, which allows different technological alternatives to be evaluated. This method is most suitable for many engineering studies (Tian et al 2021;Guo-Yan et al 2008), unlike the net present value (NPV), which is preferred in accounting (Kelly and Leahy 2019). The AW considers all costs disbursed over time and converts them into a series of annual payments that can be compared between alternatives.…”
Section: Economic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes them a good potential to be used as a cooling fluid. In recent research, nanofluids such as Copper oxide, Aluminium oxide or Magnesium oxide as a cooling medium to cool down solar panels [10] [11]. The cooling efficiency increment of both the nanofluids, as shown by Amalraj and Michael [10], averaged around 18.2 %.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cooling efficiency increment of both the nanofluids, as shown by Amalraj and Michael [10], averaged around 18.2 %. On the other hand, Tian et al [11] showed that the addition of 1% of nanoparticles results in an increment of the exergy efficiency by 0.45% when the nanofluid is flowing at 30 litres/hour. The cooling technique is similar to forced water circulation whereby they used copper tubes to pump the nanofluids onto the solar panels and remove the heat effectively.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%