Energy Expenditure Combining Strength and Aerobic Training

Vilaça, José; Bottaro, Martim; Santos, Catarina C.

doi:10.2478/v10078-011-0054-5

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Both of these studies involved concurrent training programs and recorded an increase in metabolic expenditure following the programs. This increase, however, was smaller, rising by a mean of 1200 MET-mins/week 73,74 , than that of our study in which a mean increase of 3200 MET-mins/week was recorded (Table 5). In our study, the AT group had a higher metabolic expenditure than the ST group and the CG, results that are in line with research by Bakker et al (2017), Scharhag-Rosenberger (2017), Ramírez-Vélez (2017) and Ostendorf (2019) in which it was detected that in AT programs, metabolic expenditure is higher than when ST or mixed training is implemented, especially in moderate physical activity [75][76][77][78][79][80] .…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 82%

Longitudinal Study of Body Composition and Energy Expenditure in Overweight or Obese Young Adults

Fernández-García

Gálvez-Fernández

Mercadé‐Melé

et al. 2020

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of an aerobic training program with a strength training program on body composition and energy expenditure in overweight or obese (29.06 ± 3.49 kg/m2) young adults (21.96 ± 1.90 years). Subjects (N = 109) were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a control group (CG), an aerobic training (AT) group and a strength training (ST) group. Training took place over twelve weeks comprising three sessions per week with each session lasting 60 to 90 minutes. Before and after the program, weight, height, body mass index, lean mass percentage and fat mass percentage were evaluated. In addition, The International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF) was used to estimate energy expenditure. The results of both aerobic training and strength training produced statistically significant improvements in weight (AT-CG = −2.892 kg; ST-CG = −2.986 kg); BMI (AT-CG = −1.075 kg/m2; ST-CG = −1.118 kg/m2); total body fat (AT-CG = −1529.172 g; ST-CG = −763.815); and total body fat percentage (AT-CG = −1.421%; AT-ST = −0.855%). These two exercise prescription models were therefore useful in reducing overweight and obesity, which could have an impact on improving the health and quality of life of individuals with these characteristics.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 82%

Longitudinal Study of Body Composition and Energy Expenditure in Overweight or Obese Young Adults

Fernández-García

Gálvez-Fernández

Mercadé‐Melé

et al. 2020

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For, example, Di Blasio et al [10] showed that the post-exercise (recovery) energy expenditure (oxygen consumption) is significantly greater after the integrated than after the serial combined protocol. On the other hand, simply changing the order of endurance and strength exercises (2 forms of serial combined training) does not seem to affect the energy expenditure during [39,40] or after exercise [10]. There are, however, studies which demonstrate that the order of endurance and strength exercise may affect the post-exercise energy expenditure [39,40].…”

Section: Physical Fitness and Functional Capacitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Health-Promoting Effects of Serial vs. Integrated Combined Strength and Aerobic Training

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Combined strength and aerobic training programs are widely used for improving markers of physical fitness and health. We compared the efficiency of a serial and an integrated combined training program on health and overall fitness in middle-aged females. 54 females (46.7±4.5yrs) were assigned to a serial (SCG) or an integrated (ICG) combined training group or to a control group (CG). The SCG and ICG performed a 3-month training combining aerobic dance and calisthenics. The 2 training programs differ in the sequence of aerobic and strength exercises. SCG performed the strength exercises prior to aerobic; in ICG, the aerobic and strength exercises were altered in a predetermined order. Body composition/circumferences, blood pressure, respiratory function, flexibility, balance, muscle strength/endurance, power and aerobic capacity were measured before and after training. SCG and ICG significantly increased muscle strength and endurance, power, aerobic capacity, flexibility, balance, fat-free mass and respiratory function (p<0.001-0.05), while significant reductions were observed for blood pressure, heart rate and body fat/circumferences (p<0.001-0.05). However, there were no significant differences between SCG and ICG after training. Serial and integrated combined training programs confer analogous adaptations and can be used interchangeably for counteracting the detrimental effects of sedentary lifestyle on indices of physical fitness and health.

show abstract

“…Thus, a strategy that may be used is concurrent training (Coffey and Hawley, 2017). Furthermore, Vilaça et al (2011) emphasized that a combination of AE and RE (regardless of order) is beneficial for reducing BF and increasing energy expenditure during and after PE sessions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of the Order of Physical Exercises on Body Composition, Physical Fitness, and Cardiometabolic Risk in Adolescents Participating in an Interdisciplinary Program Focusing on the Treatment of Obesity

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The main objective of this study was to investigate the effects of the order of physical exercises on body composition, physical fitness, and cardiometabolic risk in adolescents participating in an interdisciplinary program focusing on the treatment of obesity. The final 12-week analyses involved 33 female adolescents who were split into two groups of concurrent training (CT): resistance plus aerobic training and aerobic plus resistance training, with equalization performed in all physical exercises. The only difference between the two groups was the order in which the exercises were performed. The results showed reductions in fat mass, body fat, and waist circumference, as well as increases in musculoskeletal mass and resting metabolic rate ( p < 0.05) following the multiprofessional intervention period. However, no significant differences were observed in regard to body mass, body mass index, neck circumference, or arm circumference ( p > 0.05). Maximal isometric strength and maximal oxygen consumption showed significant increases after the intervention period ( p < 0.05). There were reductions in insulin, HOMA-IR, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoproteins ( p < 0.05), and an interaction within the resistance plus aerobic training group showed lower values for triglycerides when compared to itself ( p = 0.002). No difference was found in fasting glycemia for either group ( p > 0.05). It is worth noting that the equalization training variables presented no differences between the two groups ( p > 0.05). Based on these results, both CT methods were found to be effective in promoting health parameters in overweight and obese female adolescents, and triglyceride values decreased more in the resistance plus aerobic group. Future studies with larger samples and feeding control should be conducted to confirm or refute our findings.

show abstract

Energy Expenditure Combining Strength and Aerobic Training

Cited by 4 publications

References 21 publications

Longitudinal Study of Body Composition and Energy Expenditure in Overweight or Obese Young Adults

Longitudinal Study of Body Composition and Energy Expenditure in Overweight or Obese Young Adults

Health-Promoting Effects of Serial vs. Integrated Combined Strength and Aerobic Training

Effects of the Order of Physical Exercises on Body Composition, Physical Fitness, and Cardiometabolic Risk in Adolescents Participating in an Interdisciplinary Program Focusing on the Treatment of Obesity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About