1977
DOI: 10.2307/1939022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Expenditure in Free‐Ranging Lizards

Abstract: Metabolic rates of the western fence lizard Sceloporus occident a lis (Sauria: lguanidae) were measured in the laboratory by gas exchange, and in the field with doubly labeled H20. Field metabolic rates of adults during the spring reproductive season (0.22 ml C02 g-1 h-1 or 141.4J g-1 day-1 ) were not different from those during the fall nonreproductive season (0.20 ml C02 g-1 h-1 or 127.2J g-1 day-1 ). Field and laboratory metabolic rates of o o were not different from those of 2 2 in spring or fall. Average … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
1
2

Year Published

1979
1979
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
53
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This cost may involve some combination of the energy expended to climb plants (e.g. Bennett and Nagy 1977) and a greater risk of predation on open canopies (e.g. Schwarzkopf and Shine 1992).…”
Section: Reproductive Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cost may involve some combination of the energy expended to climb plants (e.g. Bennett and Nagy 1977) and a greater risk of predation on open canopies (e.g. Schwarzkopf and Shine 1992).…”
Section: Reproductive Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, depending on environmental temperature, an endotherm expends a great deal of energy for thermoregulation alone, an amount that has been estimated to be as high as 80 to 90 percent of total energy intake of a rodent active under natural conditions (7). In animals active in nature, the size of the metabolic differential between a behaviorally thermoregulating lizard and a mammal or bird of the same size is 20-to 30-fold or more (8).…”
Section: Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DLW measures the subject's carbon dioxide production by monitoring relative changes in stable isotopes of oxygen and hydrogen (Speakman 1998). DLW can be used for air breathers, including mammals (Nagy 2005), reptiles (Bennett & Nagy 1977) and birds (Masman et al 1988, Shaffer et al 2001, Mullers et al 2009), but not for fish, because the high water flux across the gills and the low metabolic rate result in only slight changes in the divergence of isotope concentrations (Speakman 1997). In contrast, f H has been shown to provide a reasonably useful estimate of metabolic rate in large (>1 kg) teleosts (Clark et al 2005, Casselman et al 2012, although limitations include high equipment costs, poor reliability ) and variable relationships between f H and oxygen consumption (Thorarensen et al 2005, Iversen et al 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%