2019
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/rnpav
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy flows in gesture-speech physics: The respiratory-vocal system and its coupling with hand gestures

Abstract: Communicative hand gesticulations are tightly coupled to prosodic aspects of speech of speech. Psychologists have characterized this multimodal synchrony as a preplanning process governed by a cognitive timing mechanism acquired only later in development. However, it has recently been found that acoustic markers of emphatic stress arise naturally during steady-state phonation when upper-limb movements impart physical impetus on the body, most likely affecting acoustics via respiratory activity. In this confirm… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
32
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(D) Here we assessed how the fundamental frequency of voicing (in the human range: 75 to 450 Hz) was modulated around the maximum extension for each vocalizer and combined for all vocalizers (red line). D shows that smoothed-average-normalized F0 (also linearly detrended and z-scaled per vocalization trial) peaked around the moment of the maximum extension, when a sudden deceleration and acceleration occurred; normalized F0 dipped at steady-state low-physical-impetus moments of the movement phase (when velocity was constant), rising again for a maximum flexion (∼300 to 375 ms before and after the maximum extension), replicating previous work (21,24). Vocalizer wrist movement showed a less pronounced F0 modulation compared to the vocalizer arm movement trials.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…(D) Here we assessed how the fundamental frequency of voicing (in the human range: 75 to 450 Hz) was modulated around the maximum extension for each vocalizer and combined for all vocalizers (red line). D shows that smoothed-average-normalized F0 (also linearly detrended and z-scaled per vocalization trial) peaked around the moment of the maximum extension, when a sudden deceleration and acceleration occurred; normalized F0 dipped at steady-state low-physical-impetus moments of the movement phase (when velocity was constant), rising again for a maximum flexion (∼300 to 375 ms before and after the maximum extension), replicating previous work (21,24). Vocalizer wrist movement showed a less pronounced F0 modulation compared to the vocalizer arm movement trials.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…For F0, the pattern is somewhat less clear, but positive peaks still occur just before the maximum extension. These findings replicate our earlier work on steadystate vocalization and mono-syllabic utterances, showing that moments of peak deceleration also show peaks in acoustics 34,37 .…”
Section: Coupling Of Vocalization Duration and Movementsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Recent work, however, has investigated a potential physical coupling of arm movements with speech via myofascial-tissue biomechanics. This works shows that hand gesturing physically impacts steady-state vocalizations and mono-syllabic consonant-vowel utterances [34][35][36][37] . Specifically, hand and arm movements can transfer a force (a physical impulse) onto the musculoskeletal system, thereby modulating respiration-related muscle activity, leading to changes in vocalization's intensity.…”
Section: Gesture-speech Physicsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations