Energy fluence measurement for pulse hard X-ray

Abstract

<sec>Pulsed high-energy fluence X-ray source is based on the “Flash II” accelerator. It can be used to carry out effect vulnerability and sensitivity test of unit level system generated electromagnetic pulse (SGEMP). The energy fluence of pulsed hard X-ray is a main parameter of the equipment beam. At present, theoretical calculation method is widely used. Energy fluence can be calculated according to the dose, energy spectrum and energy absorption coefficient of each energy segment.</sec><sec>The principle measuring energy fluence of pulsed hard X-ray by total absorption method is introduced. The photoelectric cell with lutetium silicate (LSO) scintillator is selected as a core component of the detection system, and the measurement system is developed. It is composed of scintillation detector, LSO scintillator, dimmer film, photon collimator, visible light shielding material, power supply and signal collecting system. The conversion coefficient between the incident photon energy and the waveform parameter is calibrated by a standard X-ray source. </sec><sec>The energy fluence measurement experiment is carried out with the high-energy beam source of the “Flash II” accelerator as an experimental platform. In order to meet the requirements of the effect test experiments, the series diode structure is used in the accelerator for forming a high strength and large area uniform X-ray source. In the experiment, the LiF TLD is located in the front of the phototube and used to monitor the dose. According to the measured waveform, the actual energy of the incident photons is calculated. Combined with the receiving area of incident photons, the energy fluence of pulsed hard X-ray is calculated. The average measured value is 35.9 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup> in 5 consecutive experiments. Energy fluence calculated from the measured dose and energy spectrum is 39.8 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>. The results of the two methods are compared.</sec><sec>It can be found that the experimental result is about 9.8% smaller than the theoretical value. The reasons are as follows. According to the law of exponential decay of rays in matter, in fact, the scintillator cannot absorb all the rays, and some of the rays can penetrate through, the energy of these rays cannot be detected, and thus giving rise to small experimental value. Due to the limited energy point of quasi-monoenergetic source, the sensitivity under the mean photon energy is taken as the sensitivity of the detector, and therefore there is a certain degree of uncertainty. </sec><sec>The successful application of the measurement technology provides a good experimental method for the following similar research, and can also provide a reference for X-ray intensity analysis.</sec>

New Strategy: Molten Salt‐Assisted Synthesis to Enhance Lanthanide Upconversion Luminescence

“…The initial small endothermic peak of the DSC curve is probably due to the hydrolysis reaction of chlorides with the water vapor remaining in the atmosphere after the water of crystallization has been stripped off. [ 38,39 ] When NaCl is present in the system, the DSC curve shows a sharp peak at 802.7 °C, corresponding to the melting point of NaCl, suggesting that molten NaCl will act as a high‐temperature reaction medium to assist in the synthesis at temperatures above the point. Step III exists after 868 °C that is the vaporization and departure of molten NaCl.…”

Influence of Temperature and Spin–Orbit Interaction on the Effective Mass of Polaron in an Anisotropic Quantum Dot

“…Lipparini et al [10] studied the spin-orbit effect in GaAs quantum wells, with a focus on the interaction between the Rashba effect, Dresselhaus effect, and Zeeman effect. Electron spin has also been experimentally studied, such as Qiu and Gui et al [11], who studied the giant Rashba effect in HgTe quantum wells with inverted energy bands. The spin orbit splitting of III-V semiconductors is a linear term of momentum in the Hamiltonian of the system, which results in the dispersion relation of electron energy, and the energy is split from one parabola into two.…”