2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy flux measurements during magnetron sputter deposition processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many groups have attempted to investigate the mechanism leading to the crystallization of amorphous NPs in weakly ionized, non thermal plasmas [48][49][50]. The plasma-particle interactions leading to the heating of the TiO2 NPs could be a suitable explanation to this phase transformation in O2 plasmas at low pressure.…”
Section: Chemical Analysis Of the Plasma-treated Nanostructured Tio2 mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many groups have attempted to investigate the mechanism leading to the crystallization of amorphous NPs in weakly ionized, non thermal plasmas [48][49][50]. The plasma-particle interactions leading to the heating of the TiO2 NPs could be a suitable explanation to this phase transformation in O2 plasmas at low pressure.…”
Section: Chemical Analysis Of the Plasma-treated Nanostructured Tio2 mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Condensation enthalpy is released as atoms land on the surface and heat the substrate. Besides condensation, energy is also provided to the surface by other plasma species such as ions, electrons, (fast) neutrals, and photons whose fluxes may vary in accordance with the process conditions [ 42 ]. It should be mentioned that the surface of the sputter target, whose temperature is gradually increasing because of ion bombardment, emits IR photons.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, in the case of a solid substrate, the heat transfer and resulting increase of surface temperature will influence the film growth mechanism and coating properties such as microstructure and phase constitution, as emphasized in [ 45 46 ]. Depending on the process conditions, energy flux values span from a few tens to thousands of milliwatts per square centimeter at the substrate position [ 42 , 47 ]. In the case of the SoL process, the abovementioned contributions may also impact the liquid temperature but also its physicochemical properties as plasma electrons, ions, and radiation may induce, for example, bond breaking in the liquid molecules.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…) disappear in few ms and energy flux density quickly drops as shown on inset of Figure6b. The (3) energy contribution measured just before starting the experiment (plasma off and experiment at room temperature) is equal to 8.2 mW//cm² in this work performed at 1 Pa[57] and we assume that this value is unchanged during the experiment. After subtracting this low value, the energy flux density measured just after plasma extinction (1321 s) results from the addition of the (2) contribution corresponding to the eventual evaporated species and the (6) contribution corresponding to the IR radiation emitted by the heated target (all other vacuum parts are much colder).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%