2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2008.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-income causality in OECD countries revisited: The key role of capital stock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
72
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
72
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A 1% increase in capital enhances demand for energy consumption by 0.050%, ceteries paribus. This finding supports the view of Lee et al (2008) For the panel estimation, the variable of population has a significant and positive effect on energy consumption at the 10% level. This suggests that a 1% increase in population raises energy consumption directly and indirectly by 0.013% Denotes statistical significance (+) denotes it has positive effect on the per capita CO2.…”
Section: Main Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…A 1% increase in capital enhances demand for energy consumption by 0.050%, ceteries paribus. This finding supports the view of Lee et al (2008) For the panel estimation, the variable of population has a significant and positive effect on energy consumption at the 10% level. This suggests that a 1% increase in population raises energy consumption directly and indirectly by 0.013% Denotes statistical significance (+) denotes it has positive effect on the per capita CO2.…”
Section: Main Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…As discussed above, in the energy economics literature a number of papers have found variables like GDP per capita-as well as energy consumption and labor force, which should be highly correlated with carbon emissions and population respectively-to be nonstationary in levels but stationary in first differences for OECD country panels (e.g., Lee, Chang, and Chen 2008;and Apergis and Payne 2010). Thus we have a strong a priori belief that the variables used here that are in levels should be panel I(1) as well.…”
Section: Pre-testing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it tests the variables analyzed for panel unit roots (or stationarity) and employs panel cointegration and panel FMOLS to estimate elasticities. Although the variables used in STIRPTAT analyses are stocks or stock-related and are often highly trending (and thus likely to be nonstationary), and although cointegration and FMOLS have been used extensively in the energy economics literature to examine relationships among similar variables (e.g., Lee, Chang, and Chen 2008;Apergis and Payne 2010), to our knowledge cointegration has not been used in empirical population-environment studies.…”
Section: Notementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Erdal, Erdal and Esengün (2008) also reported bidirectional causality between economic growth and energy consumption for the Turkish economy. Lee et al (2008) studied the relationship between energy consumption and economic growth for 22 OECD countries by applying the Pedroni panel cointegration test. Their findings supported the presence of a feedback effect between energy consumption per capita and real GDP per capita.…”
Section: Electricity Consumption and Economic Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%