2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-24021-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Justice Across Borders

Abstract: This book is an open access publication.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 163 publications
(204 reference statements)
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples include the dispossession of readily vulnerable communities through land grabbing by wind energy deployment in Greece and Mexico [57], or by solar energy megaprojects [56], amongst others. The EJ concept has also been posited in relation to other theoretical frameworks, such as systems literature [43]; transition frameworks (e.g., [56,41,59]) or ethical consumption [60]. Authors have also critiqued the scholarship's narrow focus, resulting in EJ's integration of whole-systems perspectives [9,43] and expansion across the supply chain [37].…”
Section: On Energy Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include the dispossession of readily vulnerable communities through land grabbing by wind energy deployment in Greece and Mexico [57], or by solar energy megaprojects [56], amongst others. The EJ concept has also been posited in relation to other theoretical frameworks, such as systems literature [43]; transition frameworks (e.g., [56,41,59]) or ethical consumption [60]. Authors have also critiqued the scholarship's narrow focus, resulting in EJ's integration of whole-systems perspectives [9,43] and expansion across the supply chain [37].…”
Section: On Energy Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entre las distintas agendas de transición, la justicia se conceptualiza de formas distintas (Heffron y McCauley, 2018) y por lo tanto existen distinciones entre los sujetos de injusticias resultantes de la operación de los sistemas energéticos entre las escalas espaciales, que van desde lo global, nacional, territorial (Bombaerts, 2020) a escalas de los hogares y los cuerpos; y las escalas temporales, pudiendo centrarse en injusticias intrageneracionales o justicias intergeneracionales. Además, las distintas agendas difieren en cuanto al sentido y profundidad de las transiciones, pudiendo involucrar abordajes que van desde soluciones dentro de los mercados existentes, apelando al Status Quo; reformas dentro del sistema económico vigente; reformas estructurales; hasta transformaciones de los sistemas políticos y económicos responsables por la crisis ambiental y social (Morena et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…A nivel global, la toma de decisiones en las escalas nacionales de políticas energéticas no se basa necesariamente en consideraciones éticas o de justicia. Tampoco necesariamente se toman acciones ante las externalidades transfronterizas o intergeneracionales (Healy et al, 2019), sin embargo, cada agenda y marco interpretativo establece de forma tácita ciertos valores respecto a quién, para quién y para qué se operan los sistemas (Bombaerts, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…more-than-humans) contributing to the materialization of socio-technical systems. The relevance of Barad´s insights about the materialization of matters relies on offering a more inclusive account of reality, helping to deal with questions of fairness, power imbalances, and justice this is precisely the concern of many STS scholars on the current transformations in the energy sector (see aspects of energy justice explored inBombaerts et al, 2019;McCauley et al, 2019).Applying the posthuman theoretical toolbox for understanding socio-technical systems reveals the intertwining of material-discursive practices. For instance, sociotechnical systems are shaped equally by technological feasibility factors and people´ interests for specific settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%