2012
DOI: 10.1021/ja3010896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Landscapes of Dynamic Ensembles of Rolling Triplet Repeat Bulge Loops: Implications for DNA Expansion Associated with Disease States

Abstract: DNA repeat domains can form ensembles of canonical and noncanonical states, including stable and metastable DNA secondary structures. Such sequence-induced structural diversity creates complex conformational landscapes for DNA processing pathways, including those triplet expansion events that accompany replication, recombination, and/or repair. Here we demonstrate further levels of conformational complexity within repeat domains. Specifically, we show that bulge loop structures within an extended repeat domain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3A and 6A) on APE1 incision activity. We showed previously for a CAG8 oligomer annealed to a “CTGN” strand (N = 2, 4, 6), that the repeat bulge loop can exist in multiple isoenergentic structural arrangements, with relatively facile inter-conversion between them, prompting the designation “rollamers” ( 31 ). The relative population of loop isomers is influenced by the relative thermodynamic impact of the abasic site and its position within the repeat, with the lesion favoring isomer states that are least energetically perturbed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3A and 6A) on APE1 incision activity. We showed previously for a CAG8 oligomer annealed to a “CTGN” strand (N = 2, 4, 6), that the repeat bulge loop can exist in multiple isoenergentic structural arrangements, with relatively facile inter-conversion between them, prompting the designation “rollamers” ( 31 ). The relative population of loop isomers is influenced by the relative thermodynamic impact of the abasic site and its position within the repeat, with the lesion favoring isomer states that are least energetically perturbed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative population of loop isomers is influenced by the relative thermodynamic impact of the abasic site and its position within the repeat, with the lesion favoring isomer states that are least energetically perturbed. CAG6F1, CAG6F3, and CAG6F5 annealed to CTG2 result in the formation of loop isomers that differ structurally in that the abasic site can be located in different structural elements of the overall bulge loop construct: i.e., in the upstream duplex (CAG6F1), the 5′ duplex loop junction (CAG6F1), the loop (CAG6F1, CAG6F3, CAG6F5), the 3′ duplex loop junction (CAG6F5), or the downstream duplex domain (CAG6F5) ( 31 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DNA slippage is believed to be a primary mechanism driving the change in repeat number of various unit sizes. Repetitive DNA sequences often form alternative structures such as bulges and hairpin loops in addition to canonical DNA conformations (7,8). A repeat unit may slip between being part of a hairpin loop, a bulge, or a duplex in a dynamic fashion, which may alter the course of normal cellular DNA chemistry and ultimately lead to repeat expansion associated with neurological diseases (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MSTs are mutational “hot-spots”, meaning they experience a significantly greater rate of somatic variability and population polymorphism than adjacent non-repetitive DNA [11-14]. The unique repetitive genomic configuration of MSTs can lead to the development of complex DNA structures susceptible to polymerase slippage and DNA breaks [11, 15-17]. This results in a distinct mutational profile for MSTs with a bias for indels, as opposed to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) which are frequently observed in non-repetitive DNA [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%