2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.adt.2015.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy levels and radiative transition rates for Ba XLVIII

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of the method depends on the number of configurations required to achieve a desired accuracy. We have also applied this method in our previous work [64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74]. In Table 1 Table 1-3, one can see that the contribution of Breit and QED corrections are equal in the order of 10 -2 for all levels except level number 3 and 27.…”
Section: Energy Levelsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The accuracy of the method depends on the number of configurations required to achieve a desired accuracy. We have also applied this method in our previous work [64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74]. In Table 1 Table 1-3, one can see that the contribution of Breit and QED corrections are equal in the order of 10 -2 for all levels except level number 3 and 27.…”
Section: Energy Levelsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…To execute accurate and elaborate calculations, we have chosen a fully relativistic MCDF method which was improved by Norrington [62] formerly built by Grant et al [63] and has been successfully implemented in our previous work [64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74]. QED corrections and Breit corrections are taken as a first order perturbation theory.…”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They included a large CI (configuration interaction) among 431 levels of 29 configurations, namely, 2s 2 2p 5 , 2s2p 6 , 2s2p 5 3ℓ, 2p 6 3ℓ, 2s 2 2p 4 3ℓ, 2s 2 2p 4 4ℓ, 2s2p 5 4ℓ, 2s 2 2p 4 5ℓ, and 2s2p 5 5ℓ. Energies for these levels and oscillator strengths (f-values) for transitions among these have already been reported by them in a separate paper [2]. Because inclusion of such a large number of levels in a scattering calculation requires significantly large computational resources, they restricted their work to the lowest 52 levels, which belong to the 2s 2 2p 5 , 2s2p 6 , and 2s 2 2p 4 3ℓ configurations.…”
Section: Collision Strengths and Effective Collision Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Comparison of oscillator strengths (f-values) for some transitions of Ba XLVIII from ground to higher excited levels. GRASP, calculations of Mohan et al[1,2] with GRASP; FAC, present calculations with FAC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only results for A-values available for the comparison purpose are those of Khatri et al [16] for transitions from the lowest three to higher excited levels of Ba XLVIII. With them we have no differences for the same reason as for the energy levels.…”
Section: Radiative Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%