1980
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(80)90410-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy levels in 137Xe populated in the decay of the delayed neutron precursor 137I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since the level-density correction factors for 137 Xe in RIPL-3 (C = 2.96189 and P = 1.09479) did not reproduce the available experimental information, we have calculated new corrections (C = −1.02 and P = 0.69). In particular, the experimental number of resonances in 137 Xe in the region 4.03-4.53 MeV, just above S n , according to the experimental work of B. Fogelberg et al [58] is 4 1/2 + levels, (24 ± 8) 1/2 − levels, and (16 ± 5) 3/2 − levels. With the original correction factors from RIPL-3 one obtains unrealistically large values: 618 1/2 + levels, 12630 1/2 − levels, and 24722 3/2 − levels.…”
Section: Tags Analysesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, since the level-density correction factors for 137 Xe in RIPL-3 (C = 2.96189 and P = 1.09479) did not reproduce the available experimental information, we have calculated new corrections (C = −1.02 and P = 0.69). In particular, the experimental number of resonances in 137 Xe in the region 4.03-4.53 MeV, just above S n , according to the experimental work of B. Fogelberg et al [58] is 4 1/2 + levels, (24 ± 8) 1/2 − levels, and (16 ± 5) 3/2 − levels. With the original correction factors from RIPL-3 one obtains unrealistically large values: 618 1/2 + levels, 12630 1/2 − levels, and 24722 3/2 − levels.…”
Section: Tags Analysesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As described above, the MTAS setup detects all three of these components of the β feeding. It is not clear how the ground state βfeeding nor the uncertainty of the previous measurement of 45.2(7)% was made [1,19].…”
Section: B 137 I Complete β-Feeding Intensitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The largest source of uncertainty in Method (1) is from Ω 137 , which is sensi- tive to the details of the β decay and the electric field in the trap. The largest uncertainty in Method (2) is the 10% uncertainty in the γ-ray intensity [41], while P n measured in Method (3) is limited by the ≈ 6% statistical uncertainty in n β136 .…”
Section: For Decays Of Trappedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trap was left empty for a period of 5, 25, or 40 s at the end of each cycle to assess backgrounds. Trap contents were also monitored by detecting a single peak from the 1218-keV (I γ = 12.8 ± 1.3%) and 1220-keV (I γ = 3.5 ± 0.4%) γ rays emitted following 137 I β decay [41] and the 455-keV (I γ = 31 ± 3%) γ ray emitted following 137 Xe β decay [34] in coincidence with β particles. The ratio of 137 I to 137 Xe was consistent with the independent yields (IY) from 252 Cf fission [42].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%