1964
DOI: 10.1016/0029-5582(64)90712-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy levels of 36Ar and 38Ar from alpha capture in sulphur and proton capture in chlorine

Abstract: Abstract:The reactions ssS(~, 7,)SeAr and e~S(~, 7)~Ar were investigated in the energy range E~ = 2.2-3.2 MeV. Five resonance states in SeAr (Ex = 8.9-9.5 MeV) and six in eSAr(Ex = 9.6-10.1 MeV) were found. The excitation energies and resonance strengths are reported. The spins and parities of most resonances showing a ground-state transition were determined from angular distribution measurements. The relative strengths of the J~ = 1-resonances in neAr and 8nAr indicate that the isobaric-spin selection rule fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The canonical [16] uncertainty of ±3keV assigned to this excitation energy is likely misattributed to this state, and more appropriately belongs to the high-spin state of tentative J π = (8 + ) at 9537.2(4) keV observed in 35 Cl(α,pγ ) 38 Ar [15]. Because of the large uncertainty in the canonical value for this state, the excitation energy of [9,10]. Gray bars indicate the energy thickness (55-75 keV in the CM system) of the gas target during the yield measurement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The canonical [16] uncertainty of ±3keV assigned to this excitation energy is likely misattributed to this state, and more appropriately belongs to the high-spin state of tentative J π = (8 + ) at 9537.2(4) keV observed in 35 Cl(α,pγ ) 38 Ar [15]. Because of the large uncertainty in the canonical value for this state, the excitation energy of [9,10]. Gray bars indicate the energy thickness (55-75 keV in the CM system) of the gas target during the yield measurement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When comparing the published results from past 34 S(α,γ ) 38 Ar experiments [3,[9][10][11]13,14], one observes a discrepancy of about a factor of 2 in the literature for the nominal value of the strength of three resonances in 34 S(α,γ ) 38 Ar within the astrophysically relevant energy range for oxygen-burning temperatures (see Table I). The resulting uncertainty in these resonance strengths leads to a significant uncertainty in the narrow resonance reaction rate in this energy range.…”
Section: Previous Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Resonance states of 36Ar have been investigated through the 32S(~, y)a6Ar and the asCl(p,-/)36Ar reactions by Ern6 et al [1][2][3]. They were also studied with lower energy resolution in the reaction 35C1(p, ~o)32S by Clarke et al 4) and by Karad'2ev et al 5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%