2012
DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/85/02/025305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy levels, radiative rates and electron impact excitation rates for transitions in He-like Mg XI, Al XII, P XIV and S XV

Abstract: We report calculations of energy levels, radiative rates and electron impact excitation cross sections and rates for transitions in Be-like Ti XIX. The grasp (General-purpose Relativistic Atomic Structure Package) is adopted for calculating energy levels and radiative rates. For determining the collision strengths and subsequently the excitation rates, the Dirac Atomic R-matrix Code (darc) is used. Oscillator strengths, radiative rates and line strengths are reported for all E1, E2, M1 and M2 transitions among… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
26
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
14
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, our MBPT energy levels and those from Savukov et al (2003) agree to by about 140 ppm, 200 ppm, and 270 ppm for Ne IX, Si XIII, and Ar XVII, respectively. Almost all the level energies calculated by Aggarwal et al (2005Aggarwal et al ( , 2008Aggarwal et al ( , 2009Aggarwal et al ( , 2010Aggarwal et al ( , 2011Aggarwal et al ( , 2012cAggarwal et al ( ,a,d,b, 2013b are lower than our MBPT values by more than 20 000 cm −1 , which corresponds to about 0.2% in the low-Z end and 300 ppm in the high-Z end. This is due to the inadequate inclusion of the electron correlation in their calculations, as pointed out above.…”
Section: Energy Levelscontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, our MBPT energy levels and those from Savukov et al (2003) agree to by about 140 ppm, 200 ppm, and 270 ppm for Ne IX, Si XIII, and Ar XVII, respectively. Almost all the level energies calculated by Aggarwal et al (2005Aggarwal et al ( , 2008Aggarwal et al ( , 2009Aggarwal et al ( , 2010Aggarwal et al ( , 2011Aggarwal et al ( , 2012cAggarwal et al ( ,a,d,b, 2013b are lower than our MBPT values by more than 20 000 cm −1 , which corresponds to about 0.2% in the low-Z end and 300 ppm in the high-Z end. This is due to the inadequate inclusion of the electron correlation in their calculations, as pointed out above.…”
Section: Energy Levelscontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…The differences between our MBPT lifetimes and those from Savukov et al (2003) are generally smaller than 1% as well. However, and as expected, our MBPT results differ substantially from those of Aggarwal et al (2005Aggarwal et al ( , 2008Aggarwal et al ( , 2009Aggarwal et al ( , 2010Aggarwal et al ( , 2011Aggarwal et al ( , 2012cAggarwal et al ( ,a,d,b, 2013b. The largest difference is up to 70% in Na X and still as large as 15% in Kr XXXV.…”
Section: Radiative Lifetimessupporting
confidence: 58%
“…However, these data are not very useful for comparisons because there are often anomalies in the calculated Ω, as may be seen in Fig. 6 of [39]- [40]. Nevertheless, the qualitative agreement for most transitions in all three ions is similar to that already discussed for Al X [10] and Ti XIX [11].…”
Section: Collision Strengthssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The average agreement between the effective collision strengths by Zhang & Sampson (1987) for transitions between n ≤ 2 levels with Aggarwal & Keenan (2012) for Mg xii and Aggarwal & Keenan (2010) for Si xiii is within 2%, except again for the 2 3 S 1 − 1 1 S 0 forbidden transition where differences as large as a factor of 2 are observed at low temperatures. On the other hand, remarkable discrepancies are found between Zhang & Sampson (1987) and Chen et al (2006) for several n ≤ 2 transitions in Ne ix at high temperatures, specially for allowed and intercombination transitions (see Fig.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…These transition-probability data sets have been shown to be accurate to better than 3% by Mendoza et al (2014). Therefore, the key benchmark is the accuracy of the effective collision strengths for these ionic species reported by Zhang & Sampson (1987), Delahaye & Pradhan (2002), Chen et al (2006), Aggarwal & Keenan (2008, 2012 and Aggarwal et al (2009Aggarwal et al ( , 2011. The evaluation of the effective collision strengths is carried out by means of the formalism developed by Burgess & Tully (1992) wherein, according to the transition type (allowed, intercombination or forbidden), the effective collision strength and electron temperature are scaled such that the temperature range 0 ≤ T e ≤ ∞ is reduced to 0 ≤ T r ≤ 1.…”
Section: Atomic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%