Energy Metabolism 1980
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-408-10641-2.50062-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Metabolism in Adult Mink in Relation to Protein-Energy Levels and Environmental Temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of ambient temperature on digestibility was very small in the present experiments (0.95 at 22" and 0.94 at 6"); a similar result has been reported for mink (Chwalibog et al 1980). These results are in contrast with those obtained with sows and ruminants where a reduction in digestibility was found at lower ambient temperatures, even at a fixed level of food intake (Fuller & Cadenhead, 1969;Westra & Christopherson, 1975;Hovell et al 1977).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of ambient temperature on digestibility was very small in the present experiments (0.95 at 22" and 0.94 at 6"); a similar result has been reported for mink (Chwalibog et al 1980). These results are in contrast with those obtained with sows and ruminants where a reduction in digestibility was found at lower ambient temperatures, even at a fixed level of food intake (Fuller & Cadenhead, 1969;Westra & Christopherson, 1975;Hovell et al 1977).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…For example, mink (Mustela vison) fed on a high-protein diet show reduced energy retention at low environmental temperatures (Chwalibog et al 1980). This problem may be exacerbated if the animals also face a shortage of drinking-water due to freezing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The (20 °C) [14]. In relation to this, the food supply in the CON group should sustain maintenance requirements, which was confirmed by the animals' fairly constant live weights.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For a period of 34 d the animals were fed in restricted amounts in order to reach a target weight of 800 g, corresponding to a lean body condition. The daily food supply was 50 g providing 250 kJ ME, and assuming a ME requirement for maintenance of 527 kJ/kg 0·75 (Chwalibog et al 1980); this corresponded to approximately 35 % ME requirement for maintenance at the start of the experiment, increasing to about 55 % ME requirement for maintenance at the target weight of 800 g. This level of restriction was justified by the fact that carnivores with seasonal cycles of fat accretion and mobilization may experience prolonged periods of low food intake or even fasting when living in the wild, and these animals had substantial body reserves available for mobilization. After the period of restricted feeding the animals were refed ad libitum for a period of approximately the same length as the restriction period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%